The Legal Regulation of Legitimate Self-Defense in Emirati Legislation and Islamic Criminal Jurisprudence

This research aims to study the concept of legitimate defense and its legal framework in both Islamic criminal jurisprudence and Emirati legislation. Through a comparative analysis, it highlights the points of agreement and difference between the two systems and reveals the legal and religious foundations upon which this right rests as a justification for action. The study employs a descriptive-analytical approach, examining religious texts from the Holy Quran and the Sunnah (Prophetic traditions), analyzing the opinions of scholars from the four major schools of Islamic jurisprudence, and studying relevant legal texts in the UAE Federal Penal Code and Emirati judicial rulings. The research addresses the conditions for legitimate defense, its limits, and its impact on criminal and civil liability, while distinguishing it from similar legal systems such as the state of necessity. The study concluded that self-defense is an inherent right established in Islamic law, and in some cases, it even rises to the level of an obligation, particularly in cases of attacks on life and honor. The UAE legislator, however, has regulated it as a justification for self-defense, precisely defining its conditions and regulations. The findings also revealed a significant convergence between Islamic jurisprudence and UAE law regarding the essence of self-defense, especially concerning the conditions of necessity and proportionality, although some differences remain in the scope of its application and legal characterization. The study concluded with a set of recommendations emphasizing the importance of strengthening legal and jurisprudential awareness of the limits of self-defense and the necessity of developing legislative texts to achieve greater clarity and consistency with Islamic principles.