AI-Mediated Judgment Cities: Governance Application Shells for Auditable Judgment Delegation

This working paper introduces the concept of the Judgment Infrastructure Gap in AI governance: the structural absence of observer-facing mechanisms that make the delegation of judgment to AI systems explicit, auditable, and reversible within institutional decision workflows. While existing AI governance frameworks primarily focus on model behavior, outputs, compliance, and ethical principles, they leave largely unaddressed how judgment authority shifts between human actors and AI systems in practice—particularly under conditions of scale, time pressure, and institutional liability. This paper argues that many governance failures attributed to AI error or misalignment instead originate from invisible judgment delegation and asymmetric responsibility allocation. To address this gap without disclosing internal system logic or model implementations, the paper proposes a governance-oriented, system-agnostic framework centered on observer-facing judgment markers and risk trajectories. These concepts are operationalized through three AI-Mediated Judgment Cities—government decision support, healthcare triage, and educational assessment—which function as standardized application shells illustrating recurring governance failure modes across domains. The contribution of this work is threefold: (1) it reframes AI governance from a model-centric problem to a judgment delegation problem; (2) it provides a deployable conceptual and design framework for making judgment flows observable at the institutional level; and (3) it establishes judgment infrastructure as a necessary complement to existing AI risk management and governance regimes. This paper is intended as a field-defining working paper suitable for academic citation, policy discussion, and further empirical or systems research, while deliberately preserving system integrity by excluding internal state-generation mechanisms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18308047
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Mediated Judgment Cities: Governance Application Shells for Auditable Judgment Delegation

Sincere Ann Ma
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI-Mediated Judgment Cities: Governance Application Shells for Auditable Judgment Delegation

Sincere Ann Ma
article en

Abstract

This working paper introduces the concept of the Judgment Infrastructure Gap in AI governance: the structural absence of observer-facing mechanisms that make the delegation of judgment to AI systems explicit, auditable, and reversible within institutional decision workflows. While existing AI governance frameworks primarily focus on model behavior, outputs, compliance, and ethical principles, they leave largely unaddressed how judgment authority shifts between human actors and AI systems in practice—particularly under conditions of scale, time pressure, and institutional liability. This paper argues that many governance failures attributed to AI error or misalignment instead originate from invisible judgment delegation and asymmetric responsibility allocation. To address this gap without disclosing internal system logic or model implementations, the paper proposes a governance-oriented, system-agnostic framework centered on observer-facing judgment markers and risk trajectories. These concepts are operationalized through three AI-Mediated Judgment Cities—government decision support, healthcare triage, and educational assessment—which function as standardized application shells illustrating recurring governance failure modes across domains. The contribution of this work is threefold: (1) it reframes AI governance from a model-centric problem to a judgment delegation problem; (2) it provides a deployable conceptual and design framework for making judgment flows observable at the institutional level; and (3) it establishes judgment infrastructure as a necessary complement to existing AI risk management and governance regimes. This paper is intended as a field-defining working paper suitable for academic citation, policy discussion, and further empirical or systems research, while deliberately preserving system integrity by excluding internal state-generation mechanisms.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.