Genome-wide association study identified genomic regions and putative candidate genes affecting different backfat layers in Landrace pigs

Backfat thickness, a key selection trait in pig-breeding programmes, has traditionally been measured as a homogeneous layer. However, backfat is anatomically structured into three distinct layers, and each layer likely contributes differently to carcass quality. In addition, previous studies have shown that the deposition of the third layer of backfat is phenotypically correlated with intramuscular fat (IMF). Therefore, targeted selection for specific backfat layers, particularly the third layer, represents a potential strategy to increase IMF content while maintaining a high lean meat percentage. However, the genetic architecture of these distinct porcine backfat layers remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to estimate the genetic parameters and identify key candidate genes underlying the three backfat layers. We collected B-mode ultrasound images from 561 Landrace pigs to measure individual layer thickness, followed by DNA extraction, genotyping, genetic parameter estimation, and a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Our measurements showed that the first layer of backfat (FBF) is the thickest, followed by the second (SBF) and the third (TBF) layers. Genetic parameter estimation yielded heritability estimates of 0.37, 0.42, 0.38, 0.34, 0.32, 0.24, and 0.21 for total backfat (BF), FBF, FBF/BF, SBF, SBF/BF, TBF, and TBF/BF, respectively. Through integrated analysis of GWAS, Bayesian fine-mapping, and gene annotation, we identified 15 non-redundant candidate genes associated with different backfat layers. These included two genes (SOAT1 and ACBD6) shared by BF and SBF, LPL for BF and FBF, and CAND1 for TBF and TBF/BF. Additionally, SERPINA12 and SERPINA6 were associated with BF; PRKAG1 and PRDM16 with FBF; EPRS1 and SLC39A10 with FBF/BF; PTGES and CRAT with SBF; and ACLY, CAVIN1, and PDZRN3 with SBF/BF. Our results indicate that each layer is governed by a distinct set of genes, which advances our understanding of the genetic basis of backfat layers in pigs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
animal
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2026.101764
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genome-wide association study identified genomic regions and putative candidate genes affecting different backfat layers in Landrace pigs

RH Huang, W. Yang, J. P. Wang, W.J. Wu et al.
animal
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Genome-wide association study identified genomic regions and putative candidate genes affecting different backfat layers in Landrace pigs

RH Huang, W. Yang, J. P. Wang, W.J. Wu, P.H. Li, Y. B. Liu, Z. X. Meng
article en

Abstract

Backfat thickness, a key selection trait in pig-breeding programmes, has traditionally been measured as a homogeneous layer. However, backfat is anatomically structured into three distinct layers, and each layer likely contributes differently to carcass quality. In addition, previous studies have shown that the deposition of the third layer of backfat is phenotypically correlated with intramuscular fat (IMF). Therefore, targeted selection for specific backfat layers, particularly the third layer, represents a potential strategy to increase IMF content while maintaining a high lean meat percentage. However, the genetic architecture of these distinct porcine backfat layers remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to estimate the genetic parameters and identify key candidate genes underlying the three backfat layers. We collected B-mode ultrasound images from 561 Landrace pigs to measure individual layer thickness, followed by DNA extraction, genotyping, genetic parameter estimation, and a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Our measurements showed that the first layer of backfat (FBF) is the thickest, followed by the second (SBF) and the third (TBF) layers. Genetic parameter estimation yielded heritability estimates of 0.37, 0.42, 0.38, 0.34, 0.32, 0.24, and 0.21 for total backfat (BF), FBF, FBF/BF, SBF, SBF/BF, TBF, and TBF/BF, respectively. Through integrated analysis of GWAS, Bayesian fine-mapping, and gene annotation, we identified 15 non-redundant candidate genes associated with different backfat layers. These included two genes (SOAT1 and ACBD6) shared by BF and SBF, LPL for BF and FBF, and CAND1 for TBF and TBF/BF. Additionally, SERPINA12 and SERPINA6 were associated with BF; PRKAG1 and PRDM16 with FBF; EPRS1 and SLC39A10 with FBF/BF; PTGES and CRAT with SBF; and ACLY, CAVIN1, and PDZRN3 with SBF/BF. Our results indicate that each layer is governed by a distinct set of genes, which advances our understanding of the genetic basis of backfat layers in pigs.

animalVol. 20(3)
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Genome-wide association study identified genomic regions and putative candidate genes affecting different backfat layers in Landrace pigs — RH Huang, W. Yang, et al. · animal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS