Evaluation Framework for Inter-Module Connections in Steel–Concrete Composite Modular Structures

This study presents a structured evaluation framework for inter-module connections in the context of steel–concrete composite modular structures, addressing a gap in existing reviews that have focused almost exclusively on steel modular systems. The paper examines tie-rod (TR), locking mechanism (LM), and bolted inter-module connections, while introducing a new sub-classification of bolted connections into direct bolted (DB) and plug-assisted bolted (PB) types based on assembly methods. A novel four-metric, five-point rating framework is introduced to assess the Composite Compatibility Score (CCS), proposed as a new metric to evaluate the applicability of steel-oriented connections to composite modules; the Validation Evidence Score (VES), which reflects the extent of experimental and numerical validation; the Demountability and Reusability Score (DRS), which measures the ease of assembly and disassembly; and the newly developed Normalised Capacity Index (NCI), which standardises structural capacity assessment across studies reporting different load capacity types. When applied to nearly 50 inter-module connections, the framework reveals that PB connections provide the most well-rounded performance across all evaluation metrics. Overall, the framework establishes a conceptual benchmark for composite modular connection technologies, providing a basis for future research and design practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020431
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation Framework for Inter-Module Connections in Steel–Concrete Composite Modular Structures

Vipulkumar Ishvarbhai Patel, Abdulelah Alotaibi, Haider Al Abadi
Buildings
BIM and Construction Integration
article

Evaluation Framework for Inter-Module Connections in Steel–Concrete Composite Modular Structures

Vipulkumar Ishvarbhai Patel, Abdulelah Alotaibi, Haider Al Abadi
article en

Abstract

This study presents a structured evaluation framework for inter-module connections in the context of steel–concrete composite modular structures, addressing a gap in existing reviews that have focused almost exclusively on steel modular systems. The paper examines tie-rod (TR), locking mechanism (LM), and bolted inter-module connections, while introducing a new sub-classification of bolted connections into direct bolted (DB) and plug-assisted bolted (PB) types based on assembly methods. A novel four-metric, five-point rating framework is introduced to assess the Composite Compatibility Score (CCS), proposed as a new metric to evaluate the applicability of steel-oriented connections to composite modules; the Validation Evidence Score (VES), which reflects the extent of experimental and numerical validation; the Demountability and Reusability Score (DRS), which measures the ease of assembly and disassembly; and the newly developed Normalised Capacity Index (NCI), which standardises structural capacity assessment across studies reporting different load capacity types. When applied to nearly 50 inter-module connections, the framework reveals that PB connections provide the most well-rounded performance across all evaluation metrics. Overall, the framework establishes a conceptual benchmark for composite modular connection technologies, providing a basis for future research and design practice.

BuildingsVol. 16(2)
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), La Trobe University (AU)
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.