Dynamic resilience quantification of urban drainage networks

• BUSRA helps municipalities plan targeted stormwater resilience interventions. • Pipe-level maps expose weak links that system-wide indicators overlook. • Resilience is tested under single-peak, multi-peak, early- and late-peak storms. • Minimum vs final resilience separates transient from persistent vulnerabilities. • Results guide LID, storage, and control placement to protect vulnerable corridors. The resilience of urban drainage systems (UDS) is increasingly recognized as a critical component in sustainable urban infrastructure, particularly under accelerating urbanization and climate change. Existing resilience assessment methods often rely on static, system-wide overflow metrics, overlooking spatiotemporal variability and component-level performance. This can mask critical vulnerabilities such as pipe surcharging, a major contributor to basement flooding. This study introduces a novel Bottom-Up System Resilience Assessment (BUSRA) framework that quantifies dynamic resilience at the pipe level using hydraulic performance metrics, rather than system overflow alone. BUSRA computes time-resolved cumulative resilience trajectories for each pipe and aggregates them into minimum, final, and system-level indicators, linking local behaviour to network-scale performance. BUSRA is applicable to single-event and continuous rainfall scenarios and to separate or combined sewer systems. The framework was applied to an urban drainage system in Kitchener, Ontario, Canada. Its system-level indicators were benchmarked against the Global Resilience Analysis method for consistency, while BUSRA provides additional component-level and temporal insights beyond what global metrics capture. Key findings include: (1) resilience should be treated as dynamic, as temporally aggregated metrics overestimate system performance; (2) spatial aggregation obscures localized vulnerabilities, whereas BUSRA reveals component-specific weaknesses; and (3) absence of surface flooding does not guarantee resilience, as internal surcharging can still cause significant damage. By delivering time-series and map-based diagnostics at multiple scales, BUSRA enables targeted practical interventions, such as pipe upsizing, storage, and Low Impact Development deployment, and supports adaptive, risk-informed infrastructure planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.134995
Primary Topic
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic resilience quantification of urban drainage networks

Sonia Hassini, Ahmed Abdelaal
Journal of Hydrology
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
article

Dynamic resilience quantification of urban drainage networks

Sonia Hassini, Ahmed Abdelaal
article en

Abstract

• BUSRA helps municipalities plan targeted stormwater resilience interventions. • Pipe-level maps expose weak links that system-wide indicators overlook. • Resilience is tested under single-peak, multi-peak, early- and late-peak storms. • Minimum vs final resilience separates transient from persistent vulnerabilities. • Results guide LID, storage, and control placement to protect vulnerable corridors. The resilience of urban drainage systems (UDS) is increasingly recognized as a critical component in sustainable urban infrastructure, particularly under accelerating urbanization and climate change. Existing resilience assessment methods often rely on static, system-wide overflow metrics, overlooking spatiotemporal variability and component-level performance. This can mask critical vulnerabilities such as pipe surcharging, a major contributor to basement flooding. This study introduces a novel Bottom-Up System Resilience Assessment (BUSRA) framework that quantifies dynamic resilience at the pipe level using hydraulic performance metrics, rather than system overflow alone. BUSRA computes time-resolved cumulative resilience trajectories for each pipe and aggregates them into minimum, final, and system-level indicators, linking local behaviour to network-scale performance. BUSRA is applicable to single-event and continuous rainfall scenarios and to separate or combined sewer systems. The framework was applied to an urban drainage system in Kitchener, Ontario, Canada. Its system-level indicators were benchmarked against the Global Resilience Analysis method for consistency, while BUSRA provides additional component-level and temporal insights beyond what global metrics capture. Key findings include: (1) resilience should be treated as dynamic, as temporally aggregated metrics overestimate system performance; (2) spatial aggregation obscures localized vulnerabilities, whereas BUSRA reveals component-specific weaknesses; and (3) absence of surface flooding does not guarantee resilience, as internal surcharging can still cause significant damage. By delivering time-series and map-based diagnostics at multiple scales, BUSRA enables targeted practical interventions, such as pipe upsizing, storage, and Low Impact Development deployment, and supports adaptive, risk-informed infrastructure planning.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 668
Helwan University (EG), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.