A collaborative study to validate in vitro assays for protein digestibility assessment using pH-drop and pH-stat methods

The diversification of protein sources used in food formulation has increased the need to assess protein quality beyond traditional food forms. Protein digestibility is a key component of the Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS), the regulatory metric derived from rodent bioassays. Ethical concerns and the high cost of animal testing limit the ability of food formulators to screen protein ingredients and evaluate processing effects on digestibility. Findings from an international collaborative study are presented to position two in vitro methods, the pH-drop and pH-stat assays, as accredited approaches for determining protein digestibility. Nine laboratories participated in the study and analyzed 12 protein ingredients. Relative standard deviations for repeatability ranged from 0.8–2.1% and 0.5–4.8%, while reproducibility ranged from 1.2–3.6% and 1.1–4.9% for the pH-drop and pH-stat methods, respectively. Comparison between the two assays demonstrated strong correlation and moderate agreement, with the pH-stat assay yielding slightly lower digestibility values. In vitro protein digestibility coefficients aligned well with literature reported true faecal protein digestibility values for comparable, non-identical protein ingredients. Both methods received official AOCS Uniform Methods Committee approval, offering simple, affordable, reliable, and ethical tools to support informed decisions on protein digestibility during food formulation. ● 9 laboratories successfully evaluated protein digestibility of 12 diverse proteins ● Both pH assays showed strong repeatability and reproducibility across laboratories ● pH-stat assay yielded slightly lower digestibility values than the pH-drop method ● Validated in vitro assays offer ethical, affordable tools for protein screening ● American Oil Chemists' Society approved pH-drop and pH-stat methods in 2025

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2026.108918
Primary Topic
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A collaborative study to validate in vitro assays for protein digestibility assessment using pH-drop and pH-stat methods

G. J. Brisson, Fiona Liu, Erin Goldberg, Vicenta Garcia Campayo et al.
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
article

A collaborative study to validate in vitro assays for protein digestibility assessment using pH-drop and pH-stat methods

G. J. Brisson, Fiona Liu, Erin Goldberg, Vicenta Garcia Campayo, Matthew G. Nosworthy, James D. House, Adam Franczyk, Barbara J. Lyle, Nandika Bandara, M.T. Nickerson, Sharon Hooper, Elaine S. Krul, Amanda G.A. Sá, Mingyan Jing, Xin Wu, Lamia L'Hocine, Lingyun Chen
article en

Abstract

The diversification of protein sources used in food formulation has increased the need to assess protein quality beyond traditional food forms. Protein digestibility is a key component of the Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS), the regulatory metric derived from rodent bioassays. Ethical concerns and the high cost of animal testing limit the ability of food formulators to screen protein ingredients and evaluate processing effects on digestibility. Findings from an international collaborative study are presented to position two in vitro methods, the pH-drop and pH-stat assays, as accredited approaches for determining protein digestibility. Nine laboratories participated in the study and analyzed 12 protein ingredients. Relative standard deviations for repeatability ranged from 0.8–2.1% and 0.5–4.8%, while reproducibility ranged from 1.2–3.6% and 1.1–4.9% for the pH-drop and pH-stat methods, respectively. Comparison between the two assays demonstrated strong correlation and moderate agreement, with the pH-stat assay yielding slightly lower digestibility values. In vitro protein digestibility coefficients aligned well with literature reported true faecal protein digestibility values for comparable, non-identical protein ingredients. Both methods received official AOCS Uniform Methods Committee approval, offering simple, affordable, reliable, and ethical tools to support informed decisions on protein digestibility during food formulation. ● 9 laboratories successfully evaluated protein digestibility of 12 diverse proteins ● Both pH assays showed strong repeatability and reproducibility across laboratories ● pH-stat assay yielded slightly lower digestibility values than the pH-drop method ● Validated in vitro assays offer ethical, affordable tools for protein screening ● American Oil Chemists' Society approved pH-drop and pH-stat methods in 2025

Journal of Food Composition and AnalysisVol. 151
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Missouri–St. Louis (US), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Cargill (United States) (US), American Oil Chemists Society (US), Université Laval (CA), University of Manitoba (CA), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.