Rapid evolution and comparative analysis of piRNA clusters in <i>D. simulans</i>

Eukaryotic genomes are ubiquitously occupied by mobile genetic elements termed transposons, which are silenced via a specialized class of small RNA called piRNA. The small RNA is produced from the transposons themselves when they occupy specialized regions of the genome termed piRNA clusters. The formation of these specialized regions, or their evolution over time, is not well understood. Recent work has suggested that they are extremely variable even within a single species such as <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>. We were interested in taking a comparative approach to piRNA cluster evolution to ask the question - what processes are unique to <i>D. melanogaster</i> and which are shared? Shared phenomena are more likely to be fundamental aspects of piRNA formation and evolution compared to those that are more labile. Using five high-quality long-read genome assemblies and five genotype-specific piRNA libraries, we approach this question from a population genetics standpoint. We annotate piRNA clusters, transposons, and structural variants in each of these five genomes. We found extensive variation in piRNA clusters across strains, with smaller piRNA clusters more likely to be limited to a single genotype. By and large, our results are consistent with a model of piRNA cluster evolution in which piRNA clusters are rapidly formed and lost, with a small subset increasing in frequency and length over time. However, we find that the TEs which nucleate the formation of small piRNA clusters are entirely distinct in <i>D. simulans</i> compared to <i>D. melanogaster</i>, and likely reflect its invasion history rather than any inherent property of the transposon to nucleate clusters. Therefore, while large common clusters can act as 'traps' as has been posited for piRNA clusters, there are also numerous small clusters that are born and lost rapidly within a species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.19.700409
Primary Topic
Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rapid evolution and comparative analysis of piRNA clusters in D. simulans

Sarah Signor, Satyam P. Srivastav, Prakash Narayanan
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
article

Rapid evolution and comparative analysis of piRNA clusters in D. simulans

Sarah Signor, Satyam P. Srivastav, Prakash Narayanan
article en

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes are ubiquitously occupied by mobile genetic elements termed transposons, which are silenced via a specialized class of small RNA called piRNA. The small RNA is produced from the transposons themselves when they occupy specialized regions of the genome termed piRNA clusters. The formation of these specialized regions, or their evolution over time, is not well understood. Recent work has suggested that they are extremely variable even within a single species such as <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>. We were interested in taking a comparative approach to piRNA cluster evolution to ask the question - what processes are unique to <i>D. melanogaster</i> and which are shared? Shared phenomena are more likely to be fundamental aspects of piRNA formation and evolution compared to those that are more labile. Using five high-quality long-read genome assemblies and five genotype-specific piRNA libraries, we approach this question from a population genetics standpoint. We annotate piRNA clusters, transposons, and structural variants in each of these five genomes. We found extensive variation in piRNA clusters across strains, with smaller piRNA clusters more likely to be limited to a single genotype. By and large, our results are consistent with a model of piRNA cluster evolution in which piRNA clusters are rapidly formed and lost, with a small subset increasing in frequency and length over time. However, we find that the TEs which nucleate the formation of small piRNA clusters are entirely distinct in <i>D. simulans</i> compared to <i>D. melanogaster</i>, and likely reflect its invasion history rather than any inherent property of the transposon to nucleate clusters. Therefore, while large common clusters can act as 'traps' as has been posited for piRNA clusters, there are also numerous small clusters that are born and lost rapidly within a species.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Dakota State University (US), Cornell University (US), North Dakota State University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.