Vaginal chlorhexidine gluconate versus fluconazole for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: A randomized noninferiority trial
Due to the limited number of participants, we cannot conclusively determine whether CHG is non-inferior to FLZ in terms of efficacy for clearing acute C. albicans infections or preventing recurrences. While the current CHG formulation caused local irritation and is not suitable for clinical use, its antifungal and biofilm-inhibiting properties remain promising. Further development of less irritative CHG formulations may offer a valuable alternative for RVVC treatment, particularly in the context of rising FLZ resistance.
Authors
- Daniel T. Altman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0926-1173)
- Margaux Balduck
- Gabriella Edfeldt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0366-5588)
- Cathrin Alvendal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4329-9965)
- Tyra Hasselrot (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5951-5618)
- Annelie Brauner
- Nina Bohm-Starke
- Ina Schuppe-Koistinen
- Kristina Broliden
Institutions
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2026-01-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340862
- Primary Topic
- Reproductive tract infections research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Karolinska Institutet