Music Streaming: Can the Spotify Model Survive?

Abstract Spotify was created in 2006 as a service to provide a legal method for streaming music. It quickly established itself as a market leader early in the streaming era. Despite being the industry leader, it took eighteen years of operation for the firm to become profitable. Even with steady losses, Spotify was able to attract investors due to its growth in revenue and number of subscribers. Other firms, seeing possible profit opportunities, entered into the streaming market adding to Spotify’s profitability challenges. In its efforts to become profitable, the company lowered expenses by cutting staff and using a loophole to reduce payments to music rights holders. Further, the firm raised prices to increase revenues. A calculation of Spotify’s elasticity of demand in the U.S. reveals that its options for continuing price increases in the future are limited. Facing increased competition, a declining market share, along with limitations on pricing, Spotify will find it increasingly difficult to remain profitable as the streaming market becomes saturated and growth slows. Efforts to diversify into new areas as well as enter new markets are being attempted by the company, however, questions remain about the prospects of the long-term profitability and viability of Spotify.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Music and Entertainment Industry Educators Association
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/meiea-2025-0005
Primary Topic
Copyright and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Music Streaming: Can the Spotify Model Survive?

Blen Solomon, Yvan J. Kelly
Journal of the Music and Entertainment Industry Educators Association
Copyright and Intellectual Property
article

Music Streaming: Can the Spotify Model Survive?

Blen Solomon, Yvan J. Kelly
article en

Abstract

Abstract Spotify was created in 2006 as a service to provide a legal method for streaming music. It quickly established itself as a market leader early in the streaming era. Despite being the industry leader, it took eighteen years of operation for the firm to become profitable. Even with steady losses, Spotify was able to attract investors due to its growth in revenue and number of subscribers. Other firms, seeing possible profit opportunities, entered into the streaming market adding to Spotify’s profitability challenges. In its efforts to become profitable, the company lowered expenses by cutting staff and using a loophole to reduce payments to music rights holders. Further, the firm raised prices to increase revenues. A calculation of Spotify’s elasticity of demand in the U.S. reveals that its options for continuing price increases in the future are limited. Facing increased competition, a declining market share, along with limitations on pricing, Spotify will find it increasingly difficult to remain profitable as the streaming market becomes saturated and growth slows. Efforts to diversify into new areas as well as enter new markets are being attempted by the company, however, questions remain about the prospects of the long-term profitability and viability of Spotify.

Journal of the Music and Entertainment Industry Educators AssociationVol. 25(1)
Flagler College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Copyright and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.