Can Multi-model Ensemble Reduce the Uncertainty in Future Climate Projections?

With ongoing debate on whether to use multi-model ensembles or a single optimal model for projecting future climate, choosing appropriate climate model is a challenge in climate change related research. This paper discusses various algorithms for integrating climate model simulations by evaluating their efficiencies using a new metric combining three statistical scores: Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, percentage bias, and the root-mean-square error to observations standard deviation ratio. It analyzes future climate, which has been derived from 31 global climate models (GCMs) under two socioeconomic pathways scenarios, alongside historical climate data from five stations over the period 1980–2014. The approach based on selecting a single climate model using a Kullback–Leibler divergence of 0.016 and a Bhattacharyya distance of 0.091 has shown the least disparity, indicating the superiority of a single GCM over ensembles for climate model selection. This study proposes a simple procedure for climate model selection, which contributes to more efficient decision-making process within climate adaptation and mitigation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Meteorology and Hydrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068373924600454
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Multi-model Ensemble Reduce the Uncertainty in Future Climate Projections?

B. R. Thapa, V. P. Pandey, S. Nepal
Russian Meteorology and Hydrology
Climate variability and models
article

Can Multi-model Ensemble Reduce the Uncertainty in Future Climate Projections?

B. R. Thapa, V. P. Pandey, S. Nepal
article en

Abstract

With ongoing debate on whether to use multi-model ensembles or a single optimal model for projecting future climate, choosing appropriate climate model is a challenge in climate change related research. This paper discusses various algorithms for integrating climate model simulations by evaluating their efficiencies using a new metric combining three statistical scores: Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, percentage bias, and the root-mean-square error to observations standard deviation ratio. It analyzes future climate, which has been derived from 31 global climate models (GCMs) under two socioeconomic pathways scenarios, alongside historical climate data from five stations over the period 1980–2014. The approach based on selecting a single climate model using a Kullback–Leibler divergence of 0.016 and a Bhattacharyya distance of 0.091 has shown the least disparity, indicating the superiority of a single GCM over ensembles for climate model selection. This study proposes a simple procedure for climate model selection, which contributes to more efficient decision-making process within climate adaptation and mitigation strategies.

Russian Meteorology and HydrologyVol. 50(10)
Pokhara University (NP), Tribhuvan University (NP), Institute of Engineering (NP)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can Multi-model Ensemble Reduce the Uncertainty in Future Climate Projections? — B. R. Thapa, V. P. Pandey, et al. · Russian Meteorology and Hydrology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS