Team Learning in Multiteam Systems: A Systematic Review of the External Team Learning Literature and Recommendations for Future Research

This article follows calls in the HRD literature to support multiteam system (MTS) learning. The objective of this article is to review the literature on external team learning (i.e., learning outside teams) to provide insight about team learning in MTSs and associated recommendations for future research. A review of 51 studies (42 quantitative, 10 qualitative) from 42 papers is guided by fundamental questions about how to enact external team learning (i.e., what, who, and when) and how to ensure a psychologically safe environment to foster that learning. The primary impact of this review is to the scholarly literature on external team learning and MTSs by identifying considerable overlap between these topics and nuances about each that have yet to be sufficiently assessed. The findings from this review provide the basis for nine recommendations for future research on theory, methods, and practical applications of external team learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Development Review
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843251410381
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Team Learning in Multiteam Systems: A Systematic Review of the External Team Learning Literature and Recommendations for Future Research

Nathanael L. Keiser, Alexandria N. Wentworth
Human Resource Development Review
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Team Learning in Multiteam Systems: A Systematic Review of the External Team Learning Literature and Recommendations for Future Research

Nathanael L. Keiser, Alexandria N. Wentworth
article en

Abstract

This article follows calls in the HRD literature to support multiteam system (MTS) learning. The objective of this article is to review the literature on external team learning (i.e., learning outside teams) to provide insight about team learning in MTSs and associated recommendations for future research. A review of 51 studies (42 quantitative, 10 qualitative) from 42 papers is guided by fundamental questions about how to enact external team learning (i.e., what, who, and when) and how to ensure a psychologically safe environment to foster that learning. The primary impact of this review is to the scholarly literature on external team learning and MTSs by identifying considerable overlap between these topics and nuances about each that have yet to be sufficiently assessed. The findings from this review provide the basis for nine recommendations for future research on theory, methods, and practical applications of external team learning.

Human Resource Development Review
Consortium of Universities of the Washington Metropolitan Area (US), United States Army (US), U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (US), Clemson University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Team Learning in Multiteam Systems: A Systematic Review of the External Team Learning Literature and Recommendations for Future Research — Nathanael L. Keiser, Alexandria N. Wentworth · Human Resource Development Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS