Barriers and facilitators of implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care using the CFIR-ERIC framework

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are integral tools that capture real-time insights into patients’ experiences. Little is known about barriers and facilitators to PROMs implementation in the Asian context. This study explores the barriers, facilitators, and strategies for implementing PROMs from both patient and provider perspectives. We interviewed 33 patients and 27 healthcare providers from Singapore General Hospital and National University Hospital. Data were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) matching tool was utilized to match implementation strategies to the identified barriers. All five domains of the CFIR framework were elicited. Facilitators included (1) Improvement in patient-healthcare provider communication, (2) Guidance relating to clinical judgement, (3) Patient empowerment, and (4) Clinician endorsement. Barriers included 1) Lack of local adaptation, (2) Cultural concerns, (3) Lack of coordinated effort, (4) Lack of formal training and (5) Disengaged healthcare workers). In total, 48 ERIC strategies were matched to the corresponding CFIR barriers. Implementing successful and sustainable PROMs requires a multifaceted approach that addresses identified barriers while strategically leveraging facilitators. Future efforts should emphasize PROMs’ value to patients and tailor strategies for diverse populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35154-9
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and facilitators of implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care using the CFIR-ERIC framework

Truls Østbye, Lian Leng Low, Ellie Choi, Julian Thumboo et al.
Scientific Reports
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Barriers and facilitators of implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care using the CFIR-ERIC framework

Truls Østbye, Lian Leng Low, Ellie Choi, Julian Thumboo, Jordan Bai, Ying Ying Leung, Cynthia Goh, Pei Shi Ong, Xin Ru Chew, Ying Shan Cheung, Ting Hui Woon, Bryan Wei Jie Chua, Sungwon Yoon, Hairil Rizal Abdullah, Nur Qasrina Binte Iskandar Lim, Tanya Phan, Jiayan Ding, Warren Fong, Yu Heng Kwan, Silvana Choo, Si Ying Tan
article en

Abstract

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are integral tools that capture real-time insights into patients’ experiences. Little is known about barriers and facilitators to PROMs implementation in the Asian context. This study explores the barriers, facilitators, and strategies for implementing PROMs from both patient and provider perspectives. We interviewed 33 patients and 27 healthcare providers from Singapore General Hospital and National University Hospital. Data were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) matching tool was utilized to match implementation strategies to the identified barriers. All five domains of the CFIR framework were elicited. Facilitators included (1) Improvement in patient-healthcare provider communication, (2) Guidance relating to clinical judgement, (3) Patient empowerment, and (4) Clinician endorsement. Barriers included 1) Lack of local adaptation, (2) Cultural concerns, (3) Lack of coordinated effort, (4) Lack of formal training and (5) Disengaged healthcare workers). In total, 48 ERIC strategies were matched to the corresponding CFIR barriers. Implementing successful and sustainable PROMs requires a multifaceted approach that addresses identified barriers while strategically leveraging facilitators. Future efforts should emphasize PROMs’ value to patients and tailor strategies for diverse populations.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Ministry of Health (SG), SingHealth (SG), National University of Singapore (SG), Duke University (US), Singapore General Hospital (SG), SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre (SG), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG), National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG), National University Hospital (SG), National University Health System (SG)
Duke-NUS Medical School
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.