Identification of priority optimization areas and determination of optimal supply intervals for ecosystem services based on BBN and PPF-MRT

Urban fringe areas are the core zones where urbanization conflicts with ecological protection. Current optimization strategies often overlook the dynamic trade-offs and land-use specificity of ecosystem services (ES). Taking Henan Province as a case study, we first identified urban fringe areas using the Iso Cluster method. We then evaluated four ES—grain production (GP), carbon storage (CS), soil retention (SR), and water yield (WY)—using the InVEST model. On this basis, three key results were derived: (1) Prioritizing low-low cluster areas revealed that CS-SR and CS-WY clusters account for 21.6% and 26.2% of the total cluster area, making them optimization targets. (2) A Bayesian belief network (BBN) was combined with land-use scenarios to identify optimization zones for cropland and forest land. For example, in the cropland scenario, priority zones were concentrated in suburban and transitional areas. The CS-SR priority zone covered 1.73% of the total urban fringe area. In comparison, the CS-WY priority zone covered 10.23%. (3) Within the priority optimization areas, the PPF-MRT threshold methodology was developed, overcoming the limitations of traditional fixed-threshold approaches that cannot account for the multi-segmented and dynamic nature of threshold intervals. For example, in the cropland scenario, CS-WY exhibited multiple synergy intervals, with CS in the ranges of 442.76–451.03 t/ha and CS > 479.17 t/ha. This study presents a systematic framework for “spatial shortfall identification-land-use scenario optimization-dynamic threshold determination” in ecological governance of urban fringe areas. The framework offers practical guidance for the sustainable management of similar regions worldwide. • Prioritize ‘low-low’ ES clusters in urban fringes for targeted governance action. • Use VIF, correlations, and mechanisms to define causal paths in a Bayesian network. • Combine BBN with land-use scenarios to map priority areas for ES optimization. • Apply PPF-MRT in priority areas to define optimal ES supply intervals. • Establish an ‘identification-optimization’ planning framework for urban fringes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114639
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of priority optimization areas and determination of optimal supply intervals for ecosystem services based on BBN and PPF-MRT

Xiaoying Ping, Qindong Fan, Pu Rong Jia, Guojie Wei et al.
Ecological Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Identification of priority optimization areas and determination of optimal supply intervals for ecosystem services based on BBN and PPF-MRT

Xiaoying Ping, Qindong Fan, Pu Rong Jia, Guojie Wei, Chenming Zhang
article en

Abstract

Urban fringe areas are the core zones where urbanization conflicts with ecological protection. Current optimization strategies often overlook the dynamic trade-offs and land-use specificity of ecosystem services (ES). Taking Henan Province as a case study, we first identified urban fringe areas using the Iso Cluster method. We then evaluated four ES—grain production (GP), carbon storage (CS), soil retention (SR), and water yield (WY)—using the InVEST model. On this basis, three key results were derived: (1) Prioritizing low-low cluster areas revealed that CS-SR and CS-WY clusters account for 21.6% and 26.2% of the total cluster area, making them optimization targets. (2) A Bayesian belief network (BBN) was combined with land-use scenarios to identify optimization zones for cropland and forest land. For example, in the cropland scenario, priority zones were concentrated in suburban and transitional areas. The CS-SR priority zone covered 1.73% of the total urban fringe area. In comparison, the CS-WY priority zone covered 10.23%. (3) Within the priority optimization areas, the PPF-MRT threshold methodology was developed, overcoming the limitations of traditional fixed-threshold approaches that cannot account for the multi-segmented and dynamic nature of threshold intervals. For example, in the cropland scenario, CS-WY exhibited multiple synergy intervals, with CS in the ranges of 442.76–451.03 t/ha and CS > 479.17 t/ha. This study presents a systematic framework for “spatial shortfall identification-land-use scenario optimization-dynamic threshold determination” in ecological governance of urban fringe areas. The framework offers practical guidance for the sustainable management of similar regions worldwide. • Prioritize ‘low-low’ ES clusters in urban fringes for targeted governance action. • Use VIF, correlations, and mechanisms to define causal paths in a Bayesian network. • Combine BBN with land-use scenarios to map priority areas for ES optimization. • Apply PPF-MRT in priority areas to define optimal ES supply intervals. • Establish an ‘identification-optimization’ planning framework for urban fringes.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 183
North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.