Laparoscopic vs. robotic-assisted antireflux surgery: a matched cohort analysis of procedure costs and outcomes

Overall, R-ARS may not offer superior short-term safety compared to L-ARS, utilizes greater resources, and appears to be less cost-effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12551-1
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laparoscopic vs. robotic-assisted antireflux surgery: a matched cohort analysis of procedure costs and outcomes

Ross Macrae Bremner, Andrés R. Latorre-Rodríguez, Sumeet K. Mittal, Arianna Vittori
Surgical Endoscopy
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

Laparoscopic vs. robotic-assisted antireflux surgery: a matched cohort analysis of procedure costs and outcomes

Ross Macrae Bremner, Andrés R. Latorre-Rodríguez, Sumeet K. Mittal, Arianna Vittori
article en

Abstract

Overall, R-ARS may not offer superior short-term safety compared to L-ARS, utilizes greater resources, and appears to be less cost-effective.

Surgical Endoscopy
Creighton University (US), St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center (US), University of Padua (IT), Creative Commons (US), Universidad del Rosario (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.