The Role of Biomarkers for Coronary Artery Disease Detection in an Australian Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic (RACPAC) streamlines the evaluation of low-to-intermediate risk chest pain and helps avoid unnecessary hospitalisation. Biomarkers {low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)} are established cardiovascular risk markers. Yet, their diagnostic value for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in RACPAC remains uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to determine the utility of biomarkers in predicting the presence of CAD in the RACPAC setting. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults attending RACPAC between 2012 and 2021. Multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses, including prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses, were used to evaluate the predictive value of hsCRP and LDL-c for the presence of CAD detected on CT Coronary Angiogram (CTCA) or Treadmill Stress Echocardiography (TSE) as the primary outcome. <b>Results:</b> 3569 patients were included in this study, the mean age was 55.4 ± 11.3 years, and 48.8% were female; 37.4% had hypertension, while 39.5% had dyslipidemia. The mean LDL-c was 3.1 ± 0.9 mmol/L, and the median hsCRP was 1.9 mg/L (IQR 0.9 to 3.8). The regression analysis for the primary outcome showed that neither hsCRP nor LDL-c predicted CAD on CTCA (hsCRP OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.02, <i>p</i> = 0.70; LDL-c OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.39, <i>p</i> = 0.11). On TSE, hsCRP was not associated with CAD, while LDL-c showed an inverse association with CAD (hsCRP OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.00, <i>p</i> = 0.78; LDL-c OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.02). ROC analysis showed AUC 0.553 for log hsCRP (95% CI 0.501 to 0.606) and 0.508 for LDL-c (95% CI 0.450 to 0.566), with <i>p</i> = 0.2756. <b>Conclusions:</b> In a large real-world RACPAC cohort, neither elevated hsCRP nor LDL-c predicted the presence of coronary artery disease in the rapid access chest pain clinic (RACPAC) cohort. In contrast, CT coronary angiography (CTCA) demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared with treadmill stress echocardiography (TSE) in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020832
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Biomarkers for Coronary Artery Disease Detection in an Australian Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic

S. Weerasooriya, N. Weerasooriya, A. Al-Fiadh, A. Salib et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

The Role of Biomarkers for Coronary Artery Disease Detection in an Australian Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic

S. Weerasooriya, N. Weerasooriya, A. Al-Fiadh, A. Salib, C. Zoumberis, Hussein Al-Fiadh, Marwan Shawki, Karen Sanders
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic (RACPAC) streamlines the evaluation of low-to-intermediate risk chest pain and helps avoid unnecessary hospitalisation. Biomarkers {low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)} are established cardiovascular risk markers. Yet, their diagnostic value for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in RACPAC remains uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to determine the utility of biomarkers in predicting the presence of CAD in the RACPAC setting. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults attending RACPAC between 2012 and 2021. Multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses, including prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses, were used to evaluate the predictive value of hsCRP and LDL-c for the presence of CAD detected on CT Coronary Angiogram (CTCA) or Treadmill Stress Echocardiography (TSE) as the primary outcome. <b>Results:</b> 3569 patients were included in this study, the mean age was 55.4 ± 11.3 years, and 48.8% were female; 37.4% had hypertension, while 39.5% had dyslipidemia. The mean LDL-c was 3.1 ± 0.9 mmol/L, and the median hsCRP was 1.9 mg/L (IQR 0.9 to 3.8). The regression analysis for the primary outcome showed that neither hsCRP nor LDL-c predicted CAD on CTCA (hsCRP OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.02, <i>p</i> = 0.70; LDL-c OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.39, <i>p</i> = 0.11). On TSE, hsCRP was not associated with CAD, while LDL-c showed an inverse association with CAD (hsCRP OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.00, <i>p</i> = 0.78; LDL-c OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.02). ROC analysis showed AUC 0.553 for log hsCRP (95% CI 0.501 to 0.606) and 0.508 for LDL-c (95% CI 0.450 to 0.566), with <i>p</i> = 0.2756. <b>Conclusions:</b> In a large real-world RACPAC cohort, neither elevated hsCRP nor LDL-c predicted the presence of coronary artery disease in the rapid access chest pain clinic (RACPAC) cohort. In contrast, CT coronary angiography (CTCA) demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared with treadmill stress echocardiography (TSE) in this setting.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(2)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Australian Centre for Heart Health (AU), Austin Health (AU), Monash University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.