Leveraging Intermolecular Contacts of Polymorphs for Tuning Solid-State Emission

Two crystalline polymorphs of a conjugated organic fluorophore were obtained through separate synthetic protocols despite crystallizing under identical conditions. The unique polymorphs were confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The two polymorphs had markedly different supramolecular packing. Thus, polymorph A was stabilized by directional C–H···N/S interactions with limited π overlap, while polymorph B assembled into extended π–π stacks and a denser network with short contacts. These structural differences resulted in distinct photophysics. Indeed, the emission quantum yield (Φfl) of Polymorph B was 4-fold lower along with multiexponential excited state kinetics compared to Polymorph A in addition to a 38 nm blue-shift in the emission. The metastable polymorph B could be converted to the thermodynamically stable Polymorph A by grinding the pristine crystal. Both intra- and supramolecular contacts could be leveraged to guide the crystal packing for modulating the emissive properties of the intrinsic fluorophores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crystal Growth & Design
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.5c01310
Primary Topic
Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging Intermolecular Contacts of Polymorphs for Tuning Solid-State Emission

A. Mohan Raj, Orlando Ortiz, Stéphane Kéna‐Cohen, Thierry Maris et al.
Crystal Growth & Design
Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
article

Leveraging Intermolecular Contacts of Polymorphs for Tuning Solid-State Emission

A. Mohan Raj, Orlando Ortiz, Stéphane Kéna‐Cohen, Thierry Maris, W. G. Skene
article en

Abstract

Two crystalline polymorphs of a conjugated organic fluorophore were obtained through separate synthetic protocols despite crystallizing under identical conditions. The unique polymorphs were confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The two polymorphs had markedly different supramolecular packing. Thus, polymorph A was stabilized by directional C–H···N/S interactions with limited π overlap, while polymorph B assembled into extended π–π stacks and a denser network with short contacts. These structural differences resulted in distinct photophysics. Indeed, the emission quantum yield (Φfl) of Polymorph B was 4-fold lower along with multiexponential excited state kinetics compared to Polymorph A in addition to a 38 nm blue-shift in the emission. The metastable polymorph B could be converted to the thermodynamically stable Polymorph A by grinding the pristine crystal. Both intra- and supramolecular contacts could be leveraged to guide the crystal packing for modulating the emissive properties of the intrinsic fluorophores.

Crystal Growth & DesignVol. 26(3)
Département de Chimie Moléculaire (FR), Laboratoire de Chimie Physique - Matière et Rayonnement (FR), Polytechnique Montréal (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Leveraging Intermolecular Contacts of Polymorphs for Tuning Solid-State Emission — A. Mohan Raj, Orlando Ortiz, et al. · Crystal Growth & Design (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS