Whose knowledge counts for transformative change? – Operationalizing epistemic justice for transdisciplinary knowledge co-production

Recent calls for transformative change recognize the need to integrate plural ways of knowing. This also entails the need to address existing and emerging issues of justice as part of transformation processes. Besides distributional, procedural and recognition justice, the concept of epistemic justice has gained momentum to identify whose knowledge counts when problems and solutions are determined. Since transdisciplinarity offers ways to integrate diverse ways of knowing, it is considered a participatory and transformative mode of knowledge production. Synthesizing how epistemic justice has been conceptualized and operationalized in transdisciplinarity and conservation contexts so far, this paper introduces a framework for understanding and addressing epistemic justice in transdisciplinary co-production processes. The framework offers entry points for systematically reflecting on how to approach epistemic justice along different dimensions of transdisciplinary co-production processes. This reflection is required to avoid (re-)producing (existing) injustices and address justice in current knowledge production systems as a deep lever of transformations. • Reflecting on epistemic justice in transdisciplinary co-production addresses knowledge production as a deep lever of transformations. • Epistemic justice can be operationalized for transdisciplinary co-production processes along four core dimensions for reflection. • Empirical research is required to identify which epistemic justice aspects should become part of ‘good practice’ in transdisciplinarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104322
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whose knowledge counts for transformative change? – Operationalizing epistemic justice for transdisciplinary knowledge co-production

Stefanie Burkhart, Flurina Schneider
1 citations
Environmental Science & Policy
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
34.32
article

Whose knowledge counts for transformative change? – Operationalizing epistemic justice for transdisciplinary knowledge co-production

Stefanie Burkhart, Flurina Schneider
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recent calls for transformative change recognize the need to integrate plural ways of knowing. This also entails the need to address existing and emerging issues of justice as part of transformation processes. Besides distributional, procedural and recognition justice, the concept of epistemic justice has gained momentum to identify whose knowledge counts when problems and solutions are determined. Since transdisciplinarity offers ways to integrate diverse ways of knowing, it is considered a participatory and transformative mode of knowledge production. Synthesizing how epistemic justice has been conceptualized and operationalized in transdisciplinarity and conservation contexts so far, this paper introduces a framework for understanding and addressing epistemic justice in transdisciplinary co-production processes. The framework offers entry points for systematically reflecting on how to approach epistemic justice along different dimensions of transdisciplinary co-production processes. This reflection is required to avoid (re-)producing (existing) injustices and address justice in current knowledge production systems as a deep lever of transformations. • Reflecting on epistemic justice in transdisciplinary co-production addresses knowledge production as a deep lever of transformations. • Epistemic justice can be operationalized for transdisciplinary co-production processes along four core dimensions for reflection. • Empirical research is required to identify which epistemic justice aspects should become part of ‘good practice’ in transdisciplinarity.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 176
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (DE), Institute for Social-Ecological Research (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
34.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.