Adapting the ADAPTE framework for Traditional Chinese Medicine clinical practice guidelines: a methodological study

Clinical practice guideline adaptation is critical for standardizing care, yet existing frameworks like the ADAPTE process lack specificity for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), whose principles diverge fundamentally from western medicine. To address this gap, we modified the ADAPTE process to align with the unique characteristics of TCM. A dual-tiered working group (core team and expert panel) simulated tested the original ADAPTE process on Traditional Chinese Medicine clinical practice guidelines (TCM CPGs), identifying challenges such as incompatibility with TCM diagnostic frameworks and holistic treatment paradigms and formed the initial version of ADAPTE-TCM. 21 experts were invited to evaluate the initial version of ADAPTE-TCM and reached a high consensus, while also providing suggestions for modifications to the initial version. Ultimately, 20 steps were modified (e.g., evidence synthesis, consensus-building) and integration of TCM CPGs specific evaluation criteria and tool. The resulting ADAPTE-TCM framework provides methodological rigor for adapting TCM CPGs. This adaptation not only bridges a critical gap in TCM CPGs adaptation but also exemplifies how evidence-based methodologies can evolve to respect diverse medical traditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Medicine
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-026-01323-1
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adapting the ADAPTE framework for Traditional Chinese Medicine clinical practice guidelines: a methodological study

H. K. Hussein, Yangyang Wang, Yasser Sami Amer, Xiuli Xie et al.
Chinese Medicine
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

Adapting the ADAPTE framework for Traditional Chinese Medicine clinical practice guidelines: a methodological study

H. K. Hussein, Yangyang Wang, Yasser Sami Amer, Xiuli Xie, Hui Li
article en

Abstract

Clinical practice guideline adaptation is critical for standardizing care, yet existing frameworks like the ADAPTE process lack specificity for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), whose principles diverge fundamentally from western medicine. To address this gap, we modified the ADAPTE process to align with the unique characteristics of TCM. A dual-tiered working group (core team and expert panel) simulated tested the original ADAPTE process on Traditional Chinese Medicine clinical practice guidelines (TCM CPGs), identifying challenges such as incompatibility with TCM diagnostic frameworks and holistic treatment paradigms and formed the initial version of ADAPTE-TCM. 21 experts were invited to evaluate the initial version of ADAPTE-TCM and reached a high consensus, while also providing suggestions for modifications to the initial version. Ultimately, 20 steps were modified (e.g., evidence synthesis, consensus-building) and integration of TCM CPGs specific evaluation criteria and tool. The resulting ADAPTE-TCM framework provides methodological rigor for adapting TCM CPGs. This adaptation not only bridges a critical gap in TCM CPGs adaptation but also exemplifies how evidence-based methodologies can evolve to respect diverse medical traditions.

Chinese MedicineVol. 21(1)
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Cairo University (EG), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of the People's Republic of China (CN), King Saud Medical City (SA), King Saud University (SA), Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.