Quantifying In Vivo Arterial Deformation from CT and MRI: A Systematic Review of Segmentation, Motion Tracking, and Kinematic Metrics

This article presents a systematic review on methods for quantifying three-dimensional, time-resolved (3D+t) deformation and motion of human arteries from Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar, and PubMed on 19 December 2025 for in vivo, patient-specific CT or MRI studies reporting motion or deformation of large human arteries. We included studies that quantified arterial deformation or motion tracking and excluded non-vascular tissues, in vitro or purely computational work. Thirty-five studies were included in the qualitative synthesis; most were small, single-centre observational cohorts. Articles were analysed qualitatively, and results were synthesised narratively. Across the 35 studies, the most common segmentation approaches are active contours and threshold, while temporal motion is tracked using either voxel registration or surface methods. These kinematic data are used to compute metrics such as circumferential and longitudinal strain, distensibility, and curvature. Several studies also employ inverse methods to estimate wall stiffness. The findings consistently show that arterial strain decreases with age (on the order of 20% per decade in some cases) and in the presence of disease, that stiffness correlates with geometric remodelling, and that deformation is spatially heterogeneous. However, insufficient data prevents meaningful comparison across methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13010121
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying In Vivo Arterial Deformation from CT and MRI: A Systematic Review of Segmentation, Motion Tracking, and Kinematic Metrics

José Fragata, André Mourato, Moisés Almeida Brito, Rodrigo Valente et al.
Bioengineering
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
article

Quantifying In Vivo Arterial Deformation from CT and MRI: A Systematic Review of Segmentation, Motion Tracking, and Kinematic Metrics

José Fragata, André Mourato, Moisés Almeida Brito, Rodrigo Valente, António Cruz Tomás, José Xavier, Bernardo Henriques, Stéphane Avril
article en

Abstract

This article presents a systematic review on methods for quantifying three-dimensional, time-resolved (3D+t) deformation and motion of human arteries from Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar, and PubMed on 19 December 2025 for in vivo, patient-specific CT or MRI studies reporting motion or deformation of large human arteries. We included studies that quantified arterial deformation or motion tracking and excluded non-vascular tissues, in vitro or purely computational work. Thirty-five studies were included in the qualitative synthesis; most were small, single-centre observational cohorts. Articles were analysed qualitatively, and results were synthesised narratively. Across the 35 studies, the most common segmentation approaches are active contours and threshold, while temporal motion is tracked using either voxel registration or surface methods. These kinematic data are used to compute metrics such as circumferential and longitudinal strain, distensibility, and curvature. Several studies also employ inverse methods to estimate wall stiffness. The findings consistently show that arterial strain decreases with age (on the order of 20% per decade in some cases) and in the presence of disease, that stiffness correlates with geometric remodelling, and that deformation is spatially heterogeneous. However, insufficient data prevents meaningful comparison across methods.

BioengineeringVol. 13(1)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Inserm (FR), Mines Saint-Étienne (FR), Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT), Nova Medical (United States) (US), Hospital de Santa Marta (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.