A Functional Sensor-to-Segment Calibration Method Reduces the Effects of Varied Sensor Placement on Estimates of Segment Angular Excursion

To collect reliable data, it is important to determine how inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor placement affects measurements of segment motion. We aimed to determine the extent to which a functional sensor-to-segment calibration method minimizes the effect of variations in sensor placement on IMU-derived segment angular excursions. Twenty healthy adults walked while wearing 3 IMUs placed on each of the pelvis, thigh, shank, and foot. Differences in estimated segment angular excursions between sensor placements were compared between an assumed sensor-to-segment calibration and 2 versions of a walking-based functional sensor-to-segment calibration. The performance of the functional calibration methods varied. The shank had the greatest difference in root mean square difference between methods (15° for assumed, 1.5° for functional calibration), but the pelvis and thigh did not have significant differences in root mean square difference between assumed and functional calibrations. Mean root mean square differences for angular excursion between sensors were <5° for most comparisons for assumed and functional calibrations. Functional calibration reduced between-subject variance in intersensor differences for all segments. Functional calibration can minimize the effect of variations in IMU sensor placement, but care should be taken to select sensor placements that minimize soft-tissue artifact (eg, anterior thigh).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2025-0073
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Functional Sensor-to-Segment Calibration Method Reduces the Effects of Varied Sensor Placement on Estimates of Segment Angular Excursion

Julien A. Mihy, Stephen M. Cain, Jocelyn F. Hafer, Mayumi Wagatsuma
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

A Functional Sensor-to-Segment Calibration Method Reduces the Effects of Varied Sensor Placement on Estimates of Segment Angular Excursion

Julien A. Mihy, Stephen M. Cain, Jocelyn F. Hafer, Mayumi Wagatsuma
article en

Abstract

To collect reliable data, it is important to determine how inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor placement affects measurements of segment motion. We aimed to determine the extent to which a functional sensor-to-segment calibration method minimizes the effect of variations in sensor placement on IMU-derived segment angular excursions. Twenty healthy adults walked while wearing 3 IMUs placed on each of the pelvis, thigh, shank, and foot. Differences in estimated segment angular excursions between sensor placements were compared between an assumed sensor-to-segment calibration and 2 versions of a walking-based functional sensor-to-segment calibration. The performance of the functional calibration methods varied. The shank had the greatest difference in root mean square difference between methods (15° for assumed, 1.5° for functional calibration), but the pelvis and thigh did not have significant differences in root mean square difference between assumed and functional calibrations. Mean root mean square differences for angular excursion between sensors were <5° for most comparisons for assumed and functional calibrations. Functional calibration reduced between-subject variance in intersensor differences for all segments. Functional calibration can minimize the effect of variations in IMU sensor placement, but care should be taken to select sensor placements that minimize soft-tissue artifact (eg, anterior thigh).

Journal of Applied BiomechanicsVol. 42(2)
West Virginia University (US), University of Delaware (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.