Identification of opportunities for strategic expansion of anesthesiology training programs

The rising demand for anesthesia services amidst a growing US population requires evaluation of how anesthesiology residency programs are geographically aligned with population centers. Despite the critical role of anesthesiologists in perioperative care, it remains unclear whether training capacity and location are optimized across regions. The primary aim of the study was to investigate national trends in anesthesiology residency program distribution to identify metro areas that could provide additional training capacity. Anesthesiology residency programs and number of positions were identified through the Association of American Medical Colleges and Doximity. Programs were linked to metropolitan statistical areas. The number of anesthesia residents per 100,000 people in each metro area was determined. Cities with populations over 1 million and no anesthesiology residency program were flagged as underutilized. Anesthesiology training density varied across metro areas, ranging from 0.4 to 30 anesthesiology residents per 100,000 people, with a national average of 7.3 per 100,000. Five metro areas were identified as underutilized, representing potential areas for strategic expansion with opportunity for high-impact growth. Targeted development in underutilized but high-growth metro areas may improve access to academic perioperative care, support workforce development, and better align graduate medical education with population needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2611216
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of opportunities for strategic expansion of anesthesiology training programs

Jed Wolpaw, Allison Mootz, Zara Nadir, Michael P. Hofkamp
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings
Global Health and Surgery
article

Identification of opportunities for strategic expansion of anesthesiology training programs

Jed Wolpaw, Allison Mootz, Zara Nadir, Michael P. Hofkamp
article en

Abstract

The rising demand for anesthesia services amidst a growing US population requires evaluation of how anesthesiology residency programs are geographically aligned with population centers. Despite the critical role of anesthesiologists in perioperative care, it remains unclear whether training capacity and location are optimized across regions. The primary aim of the study was to investigate national trends in anesthesiology residency program distribution to identify metro areas that could provide additional training capacity. Anesthesiology residency programs and number of positions were identified through the Association of American Medical Colleges and Doximity. Programs were linked to metropolitan statistical areas. The number of anesthesia residents per 100,000 people in each metro area was determined. Cities with populations over 1 million and no anesthesiology residency program were flagged as underutilized. Anesthesiology training density varied across metro areas, ranging from 0.4 to 30 anesthesiology residents per 100,000 people, with a national average of 7.3 per 100,000. Five metro areas were identified as underutilized, representing potential areas for strategic expansion with opportunity for high-impact growth. Targeted development in underutilized but high-growth metro areas may improve access to academic perioperative care, support workforce development, and better align graduate medical education with population needs.

Baylor University Medical Center ProceedingsVol. 39(2)
Texas A&M Health Science Center (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Global Health and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.