Redefining Agency: A Capability-Driven Research Agenda for Generative AI in Education

(1) Aim: This paper aims to develop a research agenda grounded in the Capability Approach to address the “quality of use” gap emerging from the proliferation of generative AI (GenAI) in education. (2) Method: We conducted a deductive thematic analysis of 21 recent academic papers (2023–2025) using the Capability-Driven Digital Education Framework (CDDEF) to synthesise emerging discourse on digital empowerment. (3) Findings: The thematic synthesis reveals three cross-cutting themes: the ambiguous impact of AI on human capabilities (scaffold vs. crutch), the shift in educational inequality from access to quality and justice, and the necessity of redefining human agency in partnership with AI. (4) Implications: The resulting agenda provides a roadmap for researchers and policymakers to ensure GenAI functions as a scaffold for expanding substantive freedoms rather than exacerbating digital divides.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010155
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining Agency: A Capability-Driven Research Agenda for Generative AI in Education

Toshinori Saito
Education Sciences
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Redefining Agency: A Capability-Driven Research Agenda for Generative AI in Education

Toshinori Saito
article en

Abstract

(1) Aim: This paper aims to develop a research agenda grounded in the Capability Approach to address the “quality of use” gap emerging from the proliferation of generative AI (GenAI) in education. (2) Method: We conducted a deductive thematic analysis of 21 recent academic papers (2023–2025) using the Capability-Driven Digital Education Framework (CDDEF) to synthesise emerging discourse on digital empowerment. (3) Findings: The thematic synthesis reveals three cross-cutting themes: the ambiguous impact of AI on human capabilities (scaffold vs. crutch), the shift in educational inequality from access to quality and justice, and the necessity of redefining human agency in partnership with AI. (4) Implications: The resulting agenda provides a roadmap for researchers and policymakers to ensure GenAI functions as a scaffold for expanding substantive freedoms rather than exacerbating digital divides.

Education SciencesVol. 16(1)
Seisa University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Redefining Agency: A Capability-Driven Research Agenda for Generative AI in Education — Toshinori Saito · Education Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS