MAS vs. MoM for Electromagnetic Scattering from a PEC Cylinder: A Comparative Study of Stability, Accuracy, and Computational Cost

Frequency domain methods used in electromagnetic analyses, such as the Method of Auxiliary Sources (MAS) and the various Moment Methods (MoM), share many similarities but have notable differences in terms of numerical stability, accuracy, and computational cost. Computational cost differs from algorithmic complexity, which is easier to define. Consequently, it is rarely analyzed systematically in numerical studies. To this end, this work deals with the canonical problem of electromagnetic scattering from an externally excited circular cylinder of infinite conductivity and applies both MAS and MoM in order to assess their solutions and behaviors from the aforementioned perspectives. This problem is solved by meticulously applying MAS and two popular variants of MoM to achieve comparable stability and accuracy. Then, the methods are compared in terms of the associated computational cost, not only in solving the ensuing matrix equations, but also in computing the near and far fields at a large number of points.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14020349
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MAS vs. MoM for Electromagnetic Scattering from a PEC Cylinder: A Comparative Study of Stability, Accuracy, and Computational Cost

G. Veropoulos, Constantinos Vlachos, Panagiotis J. Papakanellos
Mathematics
Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
article

MAS vs. MoM for Electromagnetic Scattering from a PEC Cylinder: A Comparative Study of Stability, Accuracy, and Computational Cost

G. Veropoulos, Constantinos Vlachos, Panagiotis J. Papakanellos
article en

Abstract

Frequency domain methods used in electromagnetic analyses, such as the Method of Auxiliary Sources (MAS) and the various Moment Methods (MoM), share many similarities but have notable differences in terms of numerical stability, accuracy, and computational cost. Computational cost differs from algorithmic complexity, which is easier to define. Consequently, it is rarely analyzed systematically in numerical studies. To this end, this work deals with the canonical problem of electromagnetic scattering from an externally excited circular cylinder of infinite conductivity and applies both MAS and MoM in order to assess their solutions and behaviors from the aforementioned perspectives. This problem is solved by meticulously applying MAS and two popular variants of MoM to achieve comparable stability and accuracy. Then, the methods are compared in terms of the associated computational cost, not only in solving the ensuing matrix equations, but also in computing the near and far fields at a large number of points.

MathematicsVol. 14(2)
Hellenic Naval Academy (GR), Hellenic Air Force (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.