Neural embeddings of collaboration networks predict citation impact and innovation

• We propose a method based on neural embedding methods to quantify structural diversity for individual teams. • The structural diversity effectively differentiates scientists across various scientific domains. • The structural diversity predicts citation impact, novelty, and disruption of the produced papers. • Structural diversity plays a preeminent role relative to other diversity measures. Scientific collaboration is a key driver of breakthroughs in contemporary science. While prior research has primarily focused on team diversity based on individual attributes, quantifying structural diversity based on collaborative relationships at the individual paper level remains underexplored. In this study, we apply neural embedding techniques to quantify structural diversity at the paper level and examine its association with research outcomes. Leveraging the node2vec and GraphSAGE algorithms, we embed each scientist into a dense vector space using the Microsoft Academic Graph dataset, covering 4,772,781 papers written by 5,162,397 scientists from 1995 to 2016. We show that our embedding model effectively classifies scientists across scientific domains and accurately predicts their primary scientific domains. Crucially, our analysis reveals that structural diversity is strongly associated with citation impact, novelty, and disruption at the individual paper level. Specifically, a 1SD increase in structural diversity is associated with a 7.6%, 24.7%, and 2.9% increase in citation impact, and the odds of publishing novel and disruptive papers, respectively. These findings are generalizable across multiple model specifications, time spans, different team sizes, and scientific domains. Finally, our analysis reveals that structural diversity exhibits the strongest correlation with citation impact, novelty, and disruption among all examined diversity measures. Our study highlights the importance of fostering structurally diverse collaborations and has policy implications for institutions, funders, and governments aiming to support impactful and innovative research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Processing & Management
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2026.104634
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural embeddings of collaboration networks predict citation impact and innovation

Chengyu Li, Meiling Li, Wenlong Yang, Yang Wang
Information Processing & Management
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Neural embeddings of collaboration networks predict citation impact and innovation

Chengyu Li, Meiling Li, Wenlong Yang, Yang Wang
article en

Abstract

• We propose a method based on neural embedding methods to quantify structural diversity for individual teams. • The structural diversity effectively differentiates scientists across various scientific domains. • The structural diversity predicts citation impact, novelty, and disruption of the produced papers. • Structural diversity plays a preeminent role relative to other diversity measures. Scientific collaboration is a key driver of breakthroughs in contemporary science. While prior research has primarily focused on team diversity based on individual attributes, quantifying structural diversity based on collaborative relationships at the individual paper level remains underexplored. In this study, we apply neural embedding techniques to quantify structural diversity at the paper level and examine its association with research outcomes. Leveraging the node2vec and GraphSAGE algorithms, we embed each scientist into a dense vector space using the Microsoft Academic Graph dataset, covering 4,772,781 papers written by 5,162,397 scientists from 1995 to 2016. We show that our embedding model effectively classifies scientists across scientific domains and accurately predicts their primary scientific domains. Crucially, our analysis reveals that structural diversity is strongly associated with citation impact, novelty, and disruption at the individual paper level. Specifically, a 1SD increase in structural diversity is associated with a 7.6%, 24.7%, and 2.9% increase in citation impact, and the odds of publishing novel and disruptive papers, respectively. These findings are generalizable across multiple model specifications, time spans, different team sizes, and scientific domains. Finally, our analysis reveals that structural diversity exhibits the strongest correlation with citation impact, novelty, and disruption among all examined diversity measures. Our study highlights the importance of fostering structurally diverse collaborations and has policy implications for institutions, funders, and governments aiming to support impactful and innovative research.

Information Processing & ManagementVol. 63(4)
Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.