Comparative analysis of methodologies for In-built Network-wide Road Safety Assessments

In-built Network-wide Road Safety Assessment (IRSA) procedures involve the visual inspection of road design characteristics, and assigning scores to sections of the road network based on the availability and condition of the road characteristics. The main objective of the study was to evaluate two IRSA methodologies developed for rural highways, that is the Simplified methodology, and the Networkwide Proactive methodology (NWA Proactive). Both methodologies are applied on a 10.41 km, two-lane undivided rural road section in Latina Province, Italy. The assessment focused on comparing the reliability and predictive performance of these methods. The results revealed that the level of agreement of the rankings from both methods is moderate, while, they both showed poor correlation with crash history. This indicates that there is a need for continuous testing and development of IRSA methodologies since existing ones have a great variation in terms of the choice of parameters such as; risk factors, segmentation approach, risk formulation, and ranking categories. The insights derived from this study are very relevant to road technicians and practitioners involved in road safety assessment procedures.