The impact of varieties of democracy on subjective well-being: Global evidence

This paper investigates the effect of democracy on subjective well-being (SWB) using panel data from 144 countries from 2005 to 2020. SWB measures the evaluation of life satisfaction, positive and negative emotions. In addition, democracy is conceived as a multidimensional concept, making this study utilise five different democracy indices. Addressing potential issues of endogeneity with the Lewbel two-stage least squares, our findings revealed that high-level democracy indices, such as liberal, participatory, egalitarian, electoral, and deliberative democracy enhance life satisfaction and positive emotions, while only liberal democracy significantly reduces negative emotions. The results also show that democracy improves SWB by enhancing freedom to make life choices. The findings also yield that social support, freedom to make life choices, generosity, GDP per capita, and life expectancy improve SWB and positive emotions. At the same time, perceptions of corruption and income inequality deteriorate SWB. These findings are robust to alternative econometric techniques and model specifications. The paper offers important policy implications for enhancing SWB and positive psychology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106219
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of varieties of democracy on subjective well-being: Global evidence

Alex O. Acheampong, Eric Evans Osei Opoku
Acta Psychologica
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

The impact of varieties of democracy on subjective well-being: Global evidence

Alex O. Acheampong, Eric Evans Osei Opoku
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of democracy on subjective well-being (SWB) using panel data from 144 countries from 2005 to 2020. SWB measures the evaluation of life satisfaction, positive and negative emotions. In addition, democracy is conceived as a multidimensional concept, making this study utilise five different democracy indices. Addressing potential issues of endogeneity with the Lewbel two-stage least squares, our findings revealed that high-level democracy indices, such as liberal, participatory, egalitarian, electoral, and deliberative democracy enhance life satisfaction and positive emotions, while only liberal democracy significantly reduces negative emotions. The results also show that democracy improves SWB by enhancing freedom to make life choices. The findings also yield that social support, freedom to make life choices, generosity, GDP per capita, and life expectancy improve SWB and positive emotions. At the same time, perceptions of corruption and income inequality deteriorate SWB. These findings are robust to alternative econometric techniques and model specifications. The paper offers important policy implications for enhancing SWB and positive psychology.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 263
Bond University (AU), University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN), University of Nottingham (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.