Von Neumann vs Brain-like Architecture: A Quantitative Comparison of Information Capacity and Efficiency

We present a comprehensive quantitative comparison between von Neumann and brain-like computing architectures, focusing on information capacity, energy efficiency, and fault tolerance. Key findings:- Information Capacity: Brain-like architecture achieves up to 9.3×10^13× more capacity using burst coding (phase + inter-spike interval)- Energy Efficiency: 100× more efficient due to elimination of bus transfers- Fault Tolerance: Graceful degradation up to 30% component failure- Real-World Tasks: 4/4 correct vs 3/4 for von Neumann Four coding schemes compared:1. Rate Coding: 2.5×10^10× capacity2. Phase Coding: 10^10× capacity 3. Burst Coding: 9.3×10^13× capacity (novel finding)4. Correlation Coding: 10^9× capacity This work provides theoretical foundation for the advantages of temporal coding in brain-inspired computing systems, with reproducible Python simulations. GitHub: https://github.com/hafufu-stack/brain-vs-neumann

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18307795
Primary Topic
Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Von Neumann vs Brain-like Architecture: A Quantitative Comparison of Information Capacity and Efficiency

Hiroto Funasaki
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
article

Von Neumann vs Brain-like Architecture: A Quantitative Comparison of Information Capacity and Efficiency

Hiroto Funasaki
article en

Abstract

We present a comprehensive quantitative comparison between von Neumann and brain-like computing architectures, focusing on information capacity, energy efficiency, and fault tolerance. Key findings:- Information Capacity: Brain-like architecture achieves up to 9.3×10^13× more capacity using burst coding (phase + inter-spike interval)- Energy Efficiency: 100× more efficient due to elimination of bus transfers- Fault Tolerance: Graceful degradation up to 30% component failure- Real-World Tasks: 4/4 correct vs 3/4 for von Neumann Four coding schemes compared:1. Rate Coding: 2.5×10^10× capacity2. Phase Coding: 10^10× capacity 3. Burst Coding: 9.3×10^13× capacity (novel finding)4. Correlation Coding: 10^9× capacity This work provides theoretical foundation for the advantages of temporal coding in brain-inspired computing systems, with reproducible Python simulations. GitHub: https://github.com/hafufu-stack/brain-vs-neumann

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.