Regional disparities in surgical learning curves and maturity for congenital heart surgery in Brazil’s public health system: when volume is not enough

Abstract Background The volume-outcome relationship in congenital heart surgery is established, but its validity in systems with extreme regional inequalities is unclear. This study assessed whether cumulative volume alone reduces mortality for atrial septal defect (ASD) and ventricular septal defect (VSD) repairs across Brazil’s macro-regions or if structural barriers limit improvement. Methods Nationwide cohort of 48,721 ASD and VSD repairs in Brazil’s public health system (SUS), 2008–2024. Regional learning curves were modeled using non-linear smoothing of in-hospital mortality against cumulative volume. A composite Surgical Maturity Index (IMS) integrated experience and outcome stability. Results Procedure volume was highly unequal (Southeast 44%). Mortality ranged 1.4–4.0% (ASD) and 5.8–14.0% (VSD). High-capacity regions achieved < 2% mortality after 1800–3200 cases and continued improving. Constrained regions plateaued above 2% despite > 3000 cases (interaction p = 0.004). IMS strongly correlated with lower mortality ( ρ = − 0.89). The Northeast showed rapid VSD maturity gains (+ 15.2% annual change, p = 0.001) via quality-improvement partnerships. Conclusions Systemic constraints impose a ceiling on volume-driven improvement. Targeted capability transfer accelerates maturity more effectively than volume centralization alone, informing equitable policy in public health systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cardiothoracic Surgeon
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43057-026-00186-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
63.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional disparities in surgical learning curves and maturity for congenital heart surgery in Brazil’s public health system: when volume is not enough

G. Martins, Verônica Cristina Carvalho Chaves
2 citations
The Cardiothoracic Surgeon
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
63.04
article

Regional disparities in surgical learning curves and maturity for congenital heart surgery in Brazil’s public health system: when volume is not enough

G. Martins, Verônica Cristina Carvalho Chaves
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The volume-outcome relationship in congenital heart surgery is established, but its validity in systems with extreme regional inequalities is unclear. This study assessed whether cumulative volume alone reduces mortality for atrial septal defect (ASD) and ventricular septal defect (VSD) repairs across Brazil’s macro-regions or if structural barriers limit improvement. Methods Nationwide cohort of 48,721 ASD and VSD repairs in Brazil’s public health system (SUS), 2008–2024. Regional learning curves were modeled using non-linear smoothing of in-hospital mortality against cumulative volume. A composite Surgical Maturity Index (IMS) integrated experience and outcome stability. Results Procedure volume was highly unequal (Southeast 44%). Mortality ranged 1.4–4.0% (ASD) and 5.8–14.0% (VSD). High-capacity regions achieved < 2% mortality after 1800–3200 cases and continued improving. Constrained regions plateaued above 2% despite > 3000 cases (interaction p = 0.004). IMS strongly correlated with lower mortality ( ρ = − 0.89). The Northeast showed rapid VSD maturity gains (+ 15.2% annual change, p = 0.001) via quality-improvement partnerships. Conclusions Systemic constraints impose a ceiling on volume-driven improvement. Targeted capability transfer accelerates maturity more effectively than volume centralization alone, informing equitable policy in public health systems.

The Cardiothoracic SurgeonVol. 34(1)
University of Cape Verde (CV), Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
63.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.