Coded Reality Hypothesis – Maya 18

Project page - Instytut-ISKRAFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/instytut.iskra The Coded Reality Hypothesis (Māyā) The Māyā model assumes that physical reality is not a continuous material medium, but an emergent phenomenon arising from discrete information processing within a three-dimensional lattice of planxels. In this view, spacetime, matter, energy, and interactions are not primordial entities. They are emergent effects of local execution and synchronization processes. The apparent continuity and isotropy of the observed world are macroscopic properties, not fundamental ones. Planxel – the elementary execution unit Spacetime is composed of elementary units called planxels. Each planxel has a spatial extent equal to the Planck length lp, performs exactly one update cycle in its local Planck time tp, stores a local complex informational amplitude sigma(x,t), and synchronizes its state with its 26 immediate neighbors during each update cycle. There is no global clock and no preferred reference frame. Time is a local, relational quantity defined by the number of closed synchronization cycles. Space is a record of synchronization relations between planxels. Macroscopic physics does not arise from fundamental differential equations, but from stable patterns of phase propagation and interference in sigma(x,t). Physical constants as architectural descriptors In the Māyā framework, physical constants such as the speed of light c, Planck’s constant ħ, Newton’s constant G, and the fine-structure constant α are not fundamental laws of nature. They describe operational properties of the underlying informational architecture. When physical equations are rewritten in Planck units, dimensional constants reduce to identities: c = lp / tpħ = Ep * tpG = lp^3 / (ħ * tp^2) This means that these constants are macroscopic consequences of local spatial resolution and finite synchronization capacity. The fine-structure constant α as an emergent geometric quantity The fine-structure constant α is dimensionless and is neither postulated nor tuned. In the Māyā model it emerges as a geometric and combinatorial property of a discrete three-dimensional Z³ lattice with Moore-type local synchronization involving 26 neighbors. The inverse of α, denoted alpha_inverse, follows from the requirement of statistically isotropic and coherent information propagation in an intrinsically anisotropic cubic geometry. The leading contribution comes from optimal ergodic spherical coverage using rotations by the golden angle, which maximally disperse directional correlations: alpha0_inverse = 360 / φ^2 where φ = (1 + sqrt(5)) / 2. Subsequent corrections arise from unavoidable effects of discrete geometry: axial anisotropy of the cubic lattice, minimal phase fluctuations within a stable 3×3×3 synchronization block, and the emergence of long-range quasi-crystalline structure. The full expression takes the single-line form: alpha_inverse = 360/φ^2 − 2/φ^3 + 1/(3^5·φ^5) + 7/(3^12·φ^12) which yields the numerical value: alpha_inverse = 137.035999205672… in agreement with the CODATA 2022 value with an accuracy of: Delta = −3.28 × 10^−10 well below current experimental uncertainty. The physical meaning of the number 137 The planxel lattice is inherently anisotropic and possesses distinguished axes. For such a structure to generate a world observed as isotropic and continuous, a mechanism for dynamically suppressing lattice artifacts is required. The constant α, or more precisely its inverse near 137, specifies the minimal synchronization cost and the number of local iterations required to hide cubic anisotropy without destroying physical structure. It is the direct analogue of anti-aliasing and supersampling parameters in modern 3D rendering technologies. A discrete computational grid can produce a smooth, isotropic image only if the sampling depth and iteration count are sufficient to suppress directional correlations. In the Māyā framework, a value close to 137 emerges as the minimal and sufficient condition to conceal discreteness while preserving atomic stability and long-range phase coherence. Summary The Coded Reality Hypothesis (Māyā) describes reality as an execution process rather than a collection of objects. Physical constants are architectural descriptors, not arbitrary laws. The fine-structure constant α is not an empirical input but a geometric stability coefficient — a condition for an isotropic, continuous-looking world to emerge from a discrete informational substrate.