Peer Power in Practice: A Systematic Literature Review of Peer Programs for Inclusive and Supportive Schools

In today’s multicultural and interconnected societies, as schools and classrooms become more diverse, promoting inclusive attitudes and supportive learning environments is a central challenge for education systems. Present systematic review synthesizes evidence on the effectiveness of peer programs—including mentoring, tutoring, teaching, and peer support initiatives—in enhancing inclusivity within schools. A systematic search was conducted in Web of Science, Scopus, and ERIC for studies published between 2015 and 2024, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. No review protocol was registered. Fifteen peer-reviewed articles were included based on criteria such as implementation in general education from grade 1 to grade 12 and a clear goal of improving community, social interactions, school climate, students’ attitudes, acceptance of differences, or overall inclusivity. Methodological quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), with most studies meeting all criteria. Findings demonstrate that peer programs are generally associated with improvements in inclusive attitudes, empathy, and community engagement, contributing to improved school climate and student well-being, while also supporting academic goals. Future research should expand the geographic scope of peer program studies and incorporate longitudinal designs to better understand their sustained impact across diverse educational contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010154
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer Power in Practice: A Systematic Literature Review of Peer Programs for Inclusive and Supportive Schools

Anikó Fehérvári, Edit Felső
Education Sciences
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

Peer Power in Practice: A Systematic Literature Review of Peer Programs for Inclusive and Supportive Schools

Anikó Fehérvári, Edit Felső
article en

Abstract

In today’s multicultural and interconnected societies, as schools and classrooms become more diverse, promoting inclusive attitudes and supportive learning environments is a central challenge for education systems. Present systematic review synthesizes evidence on the effectiveness of peer programs—including mentoring, tutoring, teaching, and peer support initiatives—in enhancing inclusivity within schools. A systematic search was conducted in Web of Science, Scopus, and ERIC for studies published between 2015 and 2024, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. No review protocol was registered. Fifteen peer-reviewed articles were included based on criteria such as implementation in general education from grade 1 to grade 12 and a clear goal of improving community, social interactions, school climate, students’ attitudes, acceptance of differences, or overall inclusivity. Methodological quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), with most studies meeting all criteria. Findings demonstrate that peer programs are generally associated with improvements in inclusive attitudes, empathy, and community engagement, contributing to improved school climate and student well-being, while also supporting academic goals. Future research should expand the geographic scope of peer program studies and incorporate longitudinal designs to better understand their sustained impact across diverse educational contexts.

Education SciencesVol. 16(1)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.