PFAS Vadose Zone Mass Discharge at an AFFF‐Impacted Site: 1. Validation Based on a Multiple Lines‐of‐Evidence Approach

ABSTRACT Questions have recently been raised about the suitability of using porewater samples collected with suction lysimeters to estimate per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) mass discharge in the vadose zone. Multiple lines of evidence were evaluated to determine if porewater samples collected during a data gaps investigation in the former fire training area (FFTA) at Ellsworth Air Force Base were reproducible and representative. Lines of evidence used include supplemental geologic and hydrogeologic data, which show the presence of a semi‐continuous silt/clay layer directly above the water table throughout much of the FFTA, and gravimetric moisture content results that demonstrate vertical water flow at a depth of 15 ft is substantially limited due to semi‐arid climatic conditions. Radial diagrams were used to visually demonstrate that there was negligible variability in porewater concentrations caused by varying sample yields in the deep zone. Additional lysimeters installed in the FFTA during the remedial investigation did not result in a significant difference in the estimated vertical mass discharge, which demonstrates that the number of lysimeter sampling points in this area is sufficient. Strong attenuation in PFAS soil concentrations with depth validates the order(s) of magnitude reduction between shallow and deep porewater concentrations observed near the former burn pit. Vadose zone PFAS mass discharge is shown to be 4%–19% of groundwater mass discharge below the water table for regulated constituents. Recommendations for field data collection and estimation of PFAS mass discharge in the vadose zone are presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remediation Journal
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.70058
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PFAS Vadose Zone Mass Discharge at an AFFF‐Impacted Site: 1. Validation Based on a Multiple Lines‐of‐Evidence Approach

David T. Adamson, Kevin G. Mumford, Gabriel T. Carey, Bo Guo et al.
Remediation Journal
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
article

PFAS Vadose Zone Mass Discharge at an AFFF‐Impacted Site: 1. Validation Based on a Multiple Lines‐of‐Evidence Approach

David T. Adamson, Kevin G. Mumford, Gabriel T. Carey, Bo Guo, Sabrina Moga, Kiera Rooney, Grant R. Carey, Mia Rebeiro‐Tunstall, Rita K. Krebs
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Questions have recently been raised about the suitability of using porewater samples collected with suction lysimeters to estimate per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) mass discharge in the vadose zone. Multiple lines of evidence were evaluated to determine if porewater samples collected during a data gaps investigation in the former fire training area (FFTA) at Ellsworth Air Force Base were reproducible and representative. Lines of evidence used include supplemental geologic and hydrogeologic data, which show the presence of a semi‐continuous silt/clay layer directly above the water table throughout much of the FFTA, and gravimetric moisture content results that demonstrate vertical water flow at a depth of 15 ft is substantially limited due to semi‐arid climatic conditions. Radial diagrams were used to visually demonstrate that there was negligible variability in porewater concentrations caused by varying sample yields in the deep zone. Additional lysimeters installed in the FFTA during the remedial investigation did not result in a significant difference in the estimated vertical mass discharge, which demonstrates that the number of lysimeter sampling points in this area is sufficient. Strong attenuation in PFAS soil concentrations with depth validates the order(s) of magnitude reduction between shallow and deep porewater concentrations observed near the former burn pit. Vadose zone PFAS mass discharge is shown to be 4%–19% of groundwater mass discharge below the water table for regulated constituents. Recommendations for field data collection and estimation of PFAS mass discharge in the vadose zone are presented.

Remediation JournalVol. 36(2)
United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US), University of Arizona (US), Queen's University (CA), GSI Environmental (United States) (US), Carleton University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.