The Texas Supreme Court’s Decision Concerning Ownership of Produced Water in Cactus Water Services LLC v. COG Operating LLC:  When Is Water Not Water?

As water scarcity intensifies in Texas, the legal status of "produced water"—a byproduct of oil and gas extraction—has gained increasing attention and significance. A recent decision of the Texas Supreme Court, Cactus Water Services LLC v. COG Operating LLC, addressed a novel and consequential property rights question: Who owns the produced water extracted alongside hydrocarbons? This article analyzes the Court’s decision, which held that oil and gas lessees own produced water absent express lease language to the contrary. The ruling relies upon traditional assumptions about produced water as waste, perhaps in the face of the evolving value and treatability of produced water and Texas law regarding the ownership of groundwater. Through an examination of the majority and concurring opinion and their underlying bases, this article also explores the implications for drafting future oil, gas, and groundwater rights leases, and offering practical guidance on how parties can avoid unintended conveyances of produced water.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Texas Water Journal
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21423/twj.v17i1.7233
Primary Topic
Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Texas Supreme Court’s Decision Concerning Ownership of Produced Water in Cactus Water Services LLC v. COG Operating LLC:  When Is Water Not Water?

Joshua Katz
Texas Water Journal
Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
article

The Texas Supreme Court’s Decision Concerning Ownership of Produced Water in Cactus Water Services LLC v. COG Operating LLC:  When Is Water Not Water?

Joshua Katz
article en

Abstract

As water scarcity intensifies in Texas, the legal status of "produced water"—a byproduct of oil and gas extraction—has gained increasing attention and significance. A recent decision of the Texas Supreme Court, Cactus Water Services LLC v. COG Operating LLC, addressed a novel and consequential property rights question: Who owns the produced water extracted alongside hydrocarbons? This article analyzes the Court’s decision, which held that oil and gas lessees own produced water absent express lease language to the contrary. The ruling relies upon traditional assumptions about produced water as waste, perhaps in the face of the evolving value and treatability of produced water and Texas law regarding the ownership of groundwater. Through an examination of the majority and concurring opinion and their underlying bases, this article also explores the implications for drafting future oil, gas, and groundwater rights leases, and offering practical guidance on how parties can avoid unintended conveyances of produced water.

Texas Water JournalVol. 17(1)
Centro de Supercomputación de Galicia (ES)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Texas Supreme Court’s Decision Concerning Ownership of Produced Water in Cactus Water Services LLC v. COG Operating LLC:  When Is Water Not Water? — Joshua Katz · Texas Water Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS