Stacking Ensemble Learning for Genomic Prediction Under Complex Genetic Architectures

Genomic selection (GS) estimates the GEBV from genome-wide markers to reduce generation intervals and optimize germplasm selection, which is particularly advantageous for high-cost or late-expressed traits. While models like GBLUP are popular, they assume a polygenic architecture. In contrast, the Bayesian alphabet and machine learning (ML) can accommodate other types of genetic architectures. Given that no single model is universally optimal, stacking ensembles, which train a meta-model using predictions from diverse base learners, emerge as a compelling solution. However, the application of stacking in GS often overlooks non-additive effects. This study evaluated different stacking configurations for genomic prediction across 10 simulated traits, covering additive, dominance, and epistatic genetic architectures. A 5-fold cross-validation scheme was used to assess predictive ability and other evaluation metrics. The stacking approach demonstrated superior predictive ability in all scenarios. Gains were especially pronounced in complex architectures (100 QTLs, h2 = 0.3), reaching an 83% increment over the best individual model (BayesA with dominance), and also in oligogenic scenarios with epistasis (10 QTLs, h2 = 0.6), with a 27.59% gain. The success of stacking was attributed to two key strategies: base learner selection and the use of robust meta-learners (such as principal component or penalized regression) that effectively handled multicollinearity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16020241
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stacking Ensemble Learning for Genomic Prediction Under Complex Genetic Architectures

Maurício de Oliveira Celeri, Camila Ferreira Azevedo, Cosme Damião Cruz, Laís Mayara Azevedo Barroso et al.
Agronomy
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

Stacking Ensemble Learning for Genomic Prediction Under Complex Genetic Architectures

Maurício de Oliveira Celeri, Camila Ferreira Azevedo, Cosme Damião Cruz, Laís Mayara Azevedo Barroso, Filipe Ribeiro Formiga Teixeira, Moyses Nascimento, Ana Carolina Campana Nascimento
article en

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) estimates the GEBV from genome-wide markers to reduce generation intervals and optimize germplasm selection, which is particularly advantageous for high-cost or late-expressed traits. While models like GBLUP are popular, they assume a polygenic architecture. In contrast, the Bayesian alphabet and machine learning (ML) can accommodate other types of genetic architectures. Given that no single model is universally optimal, stacking ensembles, which train a meta-model using predictions from diverse base learners, emerge as a compelling solution. However, the application of stacking in GS often overlooks non-additive effects. This study evaluated different stacking configurations for genomic prediction across 10 simulated traits, covering additive, dominance, and epistatic genetic architectures. A 5-fold cross-validation scheme was used to assess predictive ability and other evaluation metrics. The stacking approach demonstrated superior predictive ability in all scenarios. Gains were especially pronounced in complex architectures (100 QTLs, h2 = 0.3), reaching an 83% increment over the best individual model (BayesA with dominance), and also in oligogenic scenarios with epistasis (10 QTLs, h2 = 0.6), with a 27.59% gain. The success of stacking was attributed to two key strategies: base learner selection and the use of robust meta-learners (such as principal component or penalized regression) that effectively handled multicollinearity.

AgronomyVol. 16(2)
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso (BR), Universidade Federal do Piauí (BR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.