Volatility and Corporate Bond Pricing in China*

Abstract This paper investigates the impact of volatility on expected corporate bond returns in China by using transactional data from 2010 to 2022. Portfolio analysis and Fama‐MacBeth regression show that volatility has a negative impact on expected corporate bond returns. After controlling for credit rating, maturity, liquidity, stock volatility and risk exposures, the volatility effect remains significant. By incorporating a new volatility factor and the bond market factor into the term‐default two‐factor bond pricing model of Fama and French ( Journal of Financial Economics , 1993, 33, 3), we construct a new four‐factor pricing model of corporate bonds. The proposed model captures the premium of volatility risk well and makes a significant marginal contribution to explaining the excess returns of corporate bonds. In addition, we find that volatility has a predictive effect on the default of corporate bonds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.70034
Primary Topic
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Volatility and Corporate Bond Pricing in China*

G. Wang, Yuchen Fan, Na Song
Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
article

Volatility and Corporate Bond Pricing in China*

G. Wang, Yuchen Fan, Na Song
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the impact of volatility on expected corporate bond returns in China by using transactional data from 2010 to 2022. Portfolio analysis and Fama‐MacBeth regression show that volatility has a negative impact on expected corporate bond returns. After controlling for credit rating, maturity, liquidity, stock volatility and risk exposures, the volatility effect remains significant. By incorporating a new volatility factor and the bond market factor into the term‐default two‐factor bond pricing model of Fama and French ( Journal of Financial Economics , 1993, 33, 3), we construct a new four‐factor pricing model of corporate bonds. The proposed model captures the premium of volatility risk well and makes a significant marginal contribution to explaining the excess returns of corporate bonds. In addition, we find that volatility has a predictive effect on the default of corporate bonds.

Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies
Tianjin University (CN), Tianjin University of Finance and Economics (CN), Department of Finance (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.