Enabling transparent research evaluation: A method for historical RCR retrieval using public NIH metadata

The demand for improvement of research output evaluation by the international science community has been recently formulated as the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) by the American Society for Cell Biology. The Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), introduced by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is a novel metric indicating the influence of a publication on its peer group - publications from the same research field, as determined by co-citation analysis. The RCR can be viewed for the actual month. While historical RCR data exists within the NIH database, it is not exposed in a way that allows direct or simple access for researchers. We present a method to reconstruct otherwise inaccessible RCR data. A Python-based approach was deployed to extract RCR data from the NIH database and to plot RCR-values for every time point since introduction of the database. This method demonstrates the feasibility of recovering historical bibliometric information and may contribute to more transparent and accountable use of metrics in academic evaluation - in line with the goals of DORA and open science initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340697
Citations
1
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enabling transparent research evaluation: A method for historical RCR retrieval using public NIH metadata

Hendrik von Tengg‐Kobligk, Jan F. Senge, Wolfram A. Bosbach, Fabian Haupt
1 citations
PLoS ONE
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
28.09
article

Enabling transparent research evaluation: A method for historical RCR retrieval using public NIH metadata

Hendrik von Tengg‐Kobligk, Jan F. Senge, Wolfram A. Bosbach, Fabian Haupt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The demand for improvement of research output evaluation by the international science community has been recently formulated as the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) by the American Society for Cell Biology. The Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), introduced by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is a novel metric indicating the influence of a publication on its peer group - publications from the same research field, as determined by co-citation analysis. The RCR can be viewed for the actual month. While historical RCR data exists within the NIH database, it is not exposed in a way that allows direct or simple access for researchers. We present a method to reconstruct otherwise inaccessible RCR data. A Python-based approach was deployed to extract RCR data from the NIH database and to plot RCR-values for every time point since introduction of the database. This method demonstrates the feasibility of recovering historical bibliometric information and may contribute to more transparent and accountable use of metrics in academic evaluation - in line with the goals of DORA and open science initiatives.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(1)
University of Bern (CH), Analogic (United States) (US), University of Bremen (DE), University Hospital of Bern (CH)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
28.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.