Assessing the stability of ultracompact spinning boson stars with nonlinear evolutions

We reinvestigate the stability properties of ultracompact spinning boson stars with a stable light ring using fully nonlinear 3+1 and 2+1 numerical relativity simulations and two different formulations of the Einstein equations. We find no evidence of an instability on timescales of $t μ\sim 10^4$ (in units of the scalar mass), when allowing the star to be perturbed either solely by discretization error or by imposing various types of perturbations to our initial data. We find that the initially imposed perturbations exhibit slow decay, even for magnitudes just below the order where immediate collapse is induced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/2vz3-s39r
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the stability of ultracompact spinning boson stars with nonlinear evolutions

Nils Siemonsen, Anonymous, William E. East
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
article

Assessing the stability of ultracompact spinning boson stars with nonlinear evolutions

Nils Siemonsen, Anonymous, William E. East
article en

Abstract

We reinvestigate the stability properties of ultracompact spinning boson stars with a stable light ring using fully nonlinear 3+1 and 2+1 numerical relativity simulations and two different formulations of the Einstein equations. We find no evidence of an instability on timescales of $t μ\sim 10^4$ (in units of the scalar mass), when allowing the star to be perturbed either solely by discretization error or by imposing various types of perturbations to our initial data. We find that the initially imposed perturbations exhibit slow decay, even for magnitudes just below the order where immediate collapse is induced.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 113(4)
Perimeter Institute (CA), Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.