Many-to-many. Usability challenges of entity reconciliation in art history and photographic studies

Purpose This article investigates challenges in reconciling heterogeneous records across cultural institutions, focusing on art historical photo archives within the PHAROS association. Design/methodology/approach Through case studies, the study analyses reconciliation workflows and cataloguing traditions, with attention to institutional contexts, data granularities and modelling strategies. Findings Reconciliation is seldom a one-to-one operation. Ambiguities, incomplete data, shifting attributions and varying practices shape outcomes. Strategies observed include the creation of anonymous or collective entities, the use of umbrella terms, the addition of uncertainty qualifiers and reticence when ambiguity cannot be resolved. Practical implications Insights from PHAROS provide guidance for designing more robust, interoperable and sustainable cultural heritage infrastructures. Originality/value The article highlights the need to model uncertainty explicitly, offering a framework that connects technical reconciliation methods with institutional practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Documentation
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-09-2025-0284
Primary Topic
Photography and Visual Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Many-to-many. Usability challenges of entity reconciliation in art history and photographic studies

Francesca Mambelli, Marilena Daquino, Artem Kozlov
Journal of Documentation
Photography and Visual Culture
article

Many-to-many. Usability challenges of entity reconciliation in art history and photographic studies

Francesca Mambelli, Marilena Daquino, Artem Kozlov
article en

Abstract

Purpose This article investigates challenges in reconciling heterogeneous records across cultural institutions, focusing on art historical photo archives within the PHAROS association. Design/methodology/approach Through case studies, the study analyses reconciliation workflows and cataloguing traditions, with attention to institutional contexts, data granularities and modelling strategies. Findings Reconciliation is seldom a one-to-one operation. Ambiguities, incomplete data, shifting attributions and varying practices shape outcomes. Strategies observed include the creation of anonymous or collective entities, the use of umbrella terms, the addition of uncertainty qualifiers and reticence when ambiguity cannot be resolved. Practical implications Insights from PHAROS provide guidance for designing more robust, interoperable and sustainable cultural heritage infrastructures. Originality/value The article highlights the need to model uncertainty explicitly, offering a framework that connects technical reconciliation methods with institutional practices.

Journal of DocumentationVol. 82(2)
Società Italiana di Fisica (IT), GNA University (IN), Public Works (GB), University of Bologna (IT)
Harvard University Center for Italian Renaissance Studies
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Photography and Visual Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Many-to-many. Usability challenges of entity reconciliation in art history and photographic studies — Francesca Mambelli, Marilena Daquino, et al. · Journal of Documentation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS