Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Cataract Surgery with Implantation of Either a Partial-Depth of Field Extended or Monofocal Intraocular Lens

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To compare the clinical outcomes following cataract surgery with implantation of a new partial depth of field (DOFi) intraocular lens (IOL) versus a monofocal IOL of identical material, platform, and haptic design. <b>Methods</b>: Single-center, non-randomized trial including 55 patients randomly assigned to be implanted either with the partial-DOFi IOL Tecnis PureSee (partial-DOFi group, 29 patients) or the Tecnis monofocal IOL DCB00/ZCU (both Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision) (monofocal group, 26 patients). Monocular visual acuity (VA), refractive, binocular defocus curve, and patient-reported outcomes (QoV and Catquest 9SF questionnaires) were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. <b>Results</b>: No significant differences between monofocal and partial-DOFi groups were found in monocular postoperative uncorrected- (0.03 ± 0.08 vs. 0.05 ± 0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.419) and corrected-distance VA (-0.03 ± 0.04 vs. -0.03 ± 0.05, <i>p</i> = 0.642). Significantly better distance-corrected intermediate VA was found in the partial-DOFi group (0.29 ± 0.08 vs. 0.10 ± 0.06, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, postoperative monocular distance-corrected near VA was better in the partial-DOFi group (0.51 ± 0.10 vs. 0.31 ± 0.09, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the defocus curve, significantly better distance-corrected VAs compared to monofocal were found for all defocus levels from -1.50 to -4.00 D. Minor reports of starbursts were found in both IOL groups. With the Catquest questionnaire, some significant differences were found between groups including reduced difficulty reading newspapers (<i>p</i> < 0.001), improved visibility of prices while shopping (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and enhanced performance of hobbies (<i>p</i> = 0.030) and needlework (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: The partial-DOFi IOL evaluated demonstrates superior intermediate and near visual performance compared to a monofocal IOL, while maintaining equivalent distance vision and visual quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020830
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Cataract Surgery with Implantation of Either a Partial-Depth of Field Extended or Monofocal Intraocular Lens

Sergio Díaz Gómez, H Noguera, Angelica Pérez, Iñaki Basterra et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Cataract Surgery with Implantation of Either a Partial-Depth of Field Extended or Monofocal Intraocular Lens

Sergio Díaz Gómez, H Noguera, Angelica Pérez, Iñaki Basterra, Gorka Lauzirika, David P. Piñero, Ignacio Gutiérrez Santamaría
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To compare the clinical outcomes following cataract surgery with implantation of a new partial depth of field (DOFi) intraocular lens (IOL) versus a monofocal IOL of identical material, platform, and haptic design. <b>Methods</b>: Single-center, non-randomized trial including 55 patients randomly assigned to be implanted either with the partial-DOFi IOL Tecnis PureSee (partial-DOFi group, 29 patients) or the Tecnis monofocal IOL DCB00/ZCU (both Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision) (monofocal group, 26 patients). Monocular visual acuity (VA), refractive, binocular defocus curve, and patient-reported outcomes (QoV and Catquest 9SF questionnaires) were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. <b>Results</b>: No significant differences between monofocal and partial-DOFi groups were found in monocular postoperative uncorrected- (0.03 ± 0.08 vs. 0.05 ± 0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.419) and corrected-distance VA (-0.03 ± 0.04 vs. -0.03 ± 0.05, <i>p</i> = 0.642). Significantly better distance-corrected intermediate VA was found in the partial-DOFi group (0.29 ± 0.08 vs. 0.10 ± 0.06, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, postoperative monocular distance-corrected near VA was better in the partial-DOFi group (0.51 ± 0.10 vs. 0.31 ± 0.09, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the defocus curve, significantly better distance-corrected VAs compared to monofocal were found for all defocus levels from -1.50 to -4.00 D. Minor reports of starbursts were found in both IOL groups. With the Catquest questionnaire, some significant differences were found between groups including reduced difficulty reading newspapers (<i>p</i> < 0.001), improved visibility of prices while shopping (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and enhanced performance of hobbies (<i>p</i> = 0.030) and needlework (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: The partial-DOFi IOL evaluated demonstrates superior intermediate and near visual performance compared to a monofocal IOL, while maintaining equivalent distance vision and visual quality.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(2)
University of Alicante (ES), Ayuntamiento de Bilbao (ES), Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute (ES), FC Barcelona (ES)
Johnson and Johnson Vision Care
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.