Значение “неназванного имени” пленника в рассказе о Великом Инквизиторе Достоевского

The Significance of the “Unnamed” Name of the “Prisoner” in Dostoevsky’s Story of the Grand Inquisitor In Dostoevsky’s The Grand Inquisitor, the figure of the “prisoner” is generally taken to be Jesus Christ, although the text itself fails to precisely identify this figure. The absence in The Grand Inquisitor of a Proper Name for the “prisoner”, together with other textual details, is crucial to the narrative’s intrinsic structural ambiguity. Despite the author’s project and his later comments, The Grand Inquisitor does not represent a dialogue between the old inquisitor and Christ, but a monologue before a silent, lofty figure, who may be Christ – or may not be. As in Dostoevsky’s literary work in general, ambiguity is the main mark of a dominant “poetics of paradox”. Keywords: Dostoevsky; Grand Inquisitor; Christ; paradoxality; ambiguity

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Verona
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13136/1013-2309/1782
Primary Topic
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Значение “неназванного имени” пленника в рассказе о Великом Инквизиторе Достоевского

Laura Salmon
Università degli Studi di Verona
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
article

Значение “неназванного имени” пленника в рассказе о Великом Инквизиторе Достоевского

Laura Salmon
article en

Abstract

The Significance of the “Unnamed” Name of the “Prisoner” in Dostoevsky’s Story of the Grand Inquisitor In Dostoevsky’s The Grand Inquisitor, the figure of the “prisoner” is generally taken to be Jesus Christ, although the text itself fails to precisely identify this figure. The absence in The Grand Inquisitor of a Proper Name for the “prisoner”, together with other textual details, is crucial to the narrative’s intrinsic structural ambiguity. Despite the author’s project and his later comments, The Grand Inquisitor does not represent a dialogue between the old inquisitor and Christ, but a monologue before a silent, lofty figure, who may be Christ – or may not be. As in Dostoevsky’s literary work in general, ambiguity is the main mark of a dominant “poetics of paradox”. Keywords: Dostoevsky; Grand Inquisitor; Christ; paradoxality; ambiguity

Università degli Studi di Verona
University of Genoa (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.