Usefulness of the minimally invasive flow reversal method in carotid artery stenting: Simplified flow reversal carotid artery revascularization for radial access (SF-CARR)

BackgroundFlow reversal, achieved by occluding both the common and external carotid arteries to induce retrograde flow from the internal carotid artery, is a useful method for preventing distal embolization in cases of carotid artery stenting (CAS). The "conventional method" employed by our institute for CAS involves the use of one-way valves incorporated in a flow reversal system for rapid manual blood aspiration. Subsequently, we recently transitioned from the conventional method to the "simplified flow reversal carotid artery revascularization for radial access (SF-CARR)," in which external carotid artery occlusion is omitted while a transradial approach is implemented. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of SF-CARR in patients undergoing CAS.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in 50 patients diagnosed with internal carotid artery stenosis between 2022 and 2025. Of these, 24 were treated with SF-CARR, while the others underwent the conventional method. We investigated patient characteristics, endovascular procedures, procedural invasiveness, including procedural time, radiation exposure, or contrast agent use, and clinical outcomes.ResultsCompared to the conventional group, a reduced procedural time (<i>p</i> = 0.001) was observed in the SF-CARR group. The radiation exposure dose (<i>p</i> = 0.020), fluoroscopy time (<i>p</i> = 0.003), amount of contrast agent injected (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and number of contrast agent injections (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were also reduced in the SF-CARR group. In addition, the transradial approach was adopted more frequently in the SF-CARR group (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and no significant differences were reported in complications or patients' outcomes between the two groups.ConclusionThis novel flow reversal method, "SF-CARR," can provide minimally invasive treatment to patients with carotid artery stenosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interventional Neuroradiology
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199261416272
Primary Topic
Vascular Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Usefulness of the minimally invasive flow reversal method in carotid artery stenting: Simplified flow reversal carotid artery revascularization for radial access (SF-CARR)

Toru Nakagami, Eisuke Tsukagoshi, Tomomichi Kayahara, Shinya Kohyama et al.
Interventional Neuroradiology
Vascular Procedures and Complications
article

Usefulness of the minimally invasive flow reversal method in carotid artery stenting: Simplified flow reversal carotid artery revascularization for radial access (SF-CARR)

Toru Nakagami, Eisuke Tsukagoshi, Tomomichi Kayahara, Shinya Kohyama, Kazuki Fukumoto, Natsuki Shozuhara, Shunsuke Kido, Masataka Yoshimura
article en

Abstract

BackgroundFlow reversal, achieved by occluding both the common and external carotid arteries to induce retrograde flow from the internal carotid artery, is a useful method for preventing distal embolization in cases of carotid artery stenting (CAS). The "conventional method" employed by our institute for CAS involves the use of one-way valves incorporated in a flow reversal system for rapid manual blood aspiration. Subsequently, we recently transitioned from the conventional method to the "simplified flow reversal carotid artery revascularization for radial access (SF-CARR)," in which external carotid artery occlusion is omitted while a transradial approach is implemented. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of SF-CARR in patients undergoing CAS.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in 50 patients diagnosed with internal carotid artery stenosis between 2022 and 2025. Of these, 24 were treated with SF-CARR, while the others underwent the conventional method. We investigated patient characteristics, endovascular procedures, procedural invasiveness, including procedural time, radiation exposure, or contrast agent use, and clinical outcomes.ResultsCompared to the conventional group, a reduced procedural time (<i>p</i> = 0.001) was observed in the SF-CARR group. The radiation exposure dose (<i>p</i> = 0.020), fluoroscopy time (<i>p</i> = 0.003), amount of contrast agent injected (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and number of contrast agent injections (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were also reduced in the SF-CARR group. In addition, the transradial approach was adopted more frequently in the SF-CARR group (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and no significant differences were reported in complications or patients' outcomes between the two groups.ConclusionThis novel flow reversal method, "SF-CARR," can provide minimally invasive treatment to patients with carotid artery stenosis.

Interventional Neuroradiology
Saitama International Medical Center (JP), Saitama Medical University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Vascular Procedures and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.