Gene Expression-Based Colorectal Cancer Prediction Using Machine Learning and SHAP Analysis

<b>Objective:</b> To develop and validate a genetic diagnostic model for colorectal cancer (CRC). <b>Methods:</b> First, differential expression genes (DEGs) between colorectal cancer and normal groups were screened using the TCGA database. Subsequently, a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was performed using the eQTL genomic data from the IEU OpenGWAS database and colorectal cancer outcomes from the R12 Finnish database to identify associated genes. The intersecting genes from both methods were selected for the development and validation of the CRC genetic diagnostic model using nine machine learning algorithms: Lasso Regression, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Neural Network (NN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), and Decision Tree (DT). <b>Results:</b> A total of 3716 DEGs were identified from the TCGA database, while 121 genes were associated with CRC based on the eQTL Mendelian randomization analysis. The intersection of these two methods yielded 27 genes. Among the nine machine learning methods, XGBoost achieved the highest AUC value of 0.990. The top five genes predicted by the XGBoost method-RIF1, GDPD5, DBNDD1, RCCD1, and CLDN5-along with the five most significantly differentially expressed genes (<i>ASCL2</i>, <i>IFITM3</i>, <i>IFITM1</i>, <i>SMPDL3A</i>, and <i>SUCLG2</i>) in the GSE87211 dataset, were selected for the construction of the final colorectal cancer (CRC) genetic diagnostic model. The ROC curve analysis revealed an AUC (95% CI) of 0.9875 (0.9737-0.9875) for the training set, and 0.9601 (0.9145-0.9601) for the validation set, indicating strong predictive performance of the model. SHAP model interpretation further identified <i>IFITM1</i> and <i>DBNDD1</i> as the most influential genes in the XGBoost model, with both making positive contributions to the model's predictions. <b>Conclusions:</b> The gene expression profile in colorectal cancer is characterized by enhanced cell proliferation, elevated metabolic activity, and immune evasion. A genetic diagnostic model constructed based on ten genes (<i>RIF1</i>, <i>GDPD5</i>, <i>DBNDD1</i>, <i>RCCD1</i>, <i>CLDN5</i>, <i>ASCL2</i>, <i>IFITM3</i>, <i>IFITM1</i>, <i>SMPDL3A</i>, and <i>SUCLG2</i>) demonstrates strong predictive performance. This model holds significant potential for the early diagnosis and intervention of colorectal cancer, contributing to the implementation of third-tier prevention strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genes
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17010114
Primary Topic
Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gene Expression-Based Colorectal Cancer Prediction Using Machine Learning and SHAP Analysis

Xiaoyao Li, Xu Chen, Zhen Yang, Yulai Yin et al.
Genes
Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
article

Gene Expression-Based Colorectal Cancer Prediction Using Machine Learning and SHAP Analysis

Xiaoyao Li, Xu Chen, Zhen Yang, Yulai Yin, Shuo Gong
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> To develop and validate a genetic diagnostic model for colorectal cancer (CRC). <b>Methods:</b> First, differential expression genes (DEGs) between colorectal cancer and normal groups were screened using the TCGA database. Subsequently, a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was performed using the eQTL genomic data from the IEU OpenGWAS database and colorectal cancer outcomes from the R12 Finnish database to identify associated genes. The intersecting genes from both methods were selected for the development and validation of the CRC genetic diagnostic model using nine machine learning algorithms: Lasso Regression, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Neural Network (NN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), and Decision Tree (DT). <b>Results:</b> A total of 3716 DEGs were identified from the TCGA database, while 121 genes were associated with CRC based on the eQTL Mendelian randomization analysis. The intersection of these two methods yielded 27 genes. Among the nine machine learning methods, XGBoost achieved the highest AUC value of 0.990. The top five genes predicted by the XGBoost method-RIF1, GDPD5, DBNDD1, RCCD1, and CLDN5-along with the five most significantly differentially expressed genes (<i>ASCL2</i>, <i>IFITM3</i>, <i>IFITM1</i>, <i>SMPDL3A</i>, and <i>SUCLG2</i>) in the GSE87211 dataset, were selected for the construction of the final colorectal cancer (CRC) genetic diagnostic model. The ROC curve analysis revealed an AUC (95% CI) of 0.9875 (0.9737-0.9875) for the training set, and 0.9601 (0.9145-0.9601) for the validation set, indicating strong predictive performance of the model. SHAP model interpretation further identified <i>IFITM1</i> and <i>DBNDD1</i> as the most influential genes in the XGBoost model, with both making positive contributions to the model's predictions. <b>Conclusions:</b> The gene expression profile in colorectal cancer is characterized by enhanced cell proliferation, elevated metabolic activity, and immune evasion. A genetic diagnostic model constructed based on ten genes (<i>RIF1</i>, <i>GDPD5</i>, <i>DBNDD1</i>, <i>RCCD1</i>, <i>CLDN5</i>, <i>ASCL2</i>, <i>IFITM3</i>, <i>IFITM1</i>, <i>SMPDL3A</i>, and <i>SUCLG2</i>) demonstrates strong predictive performance. This model holds significant potential for the early diagnosis and intervention of colorectal cancer, contributing to the implementation of third-tier prevention strategies.

GenesVol. 17(1)
Nankai University (CN), Tianjin First Center Hospital (CN), Tianjin Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.