Conceptual overlap and multiple symbolization in signed languages

Abstract In this paper we explore conceptual overlap in two signed languages. Our data comes from natural discourse in Brazilian Sign Language (Libras) and Argentine Sign Language (LSA). Our analysis relies on theoretical constructs derived from cognitive grammar, which posits just three core elements: semantic structures, phonological structures, and symbolic structures which are associations of the first two. Signed languages use symbolic structures we call Places to conceptualize space in signed discourse. We show that one way signed languages express conceptual overlap is with phonological overlap: placing signs at the same spatial location. Our data demonstrates how Places establish nominal referents and discourse topics, create associations among referents, and structure the flow of information. We also offer an account of agreement as a type of conceptual overlap expressed by phonological overlap. A currently popular account of agreement in signed languages argues that these expressions consist of “fusions” of language and gesture. Our account relies solely on linguistic elements and is compatible with that of agreement as multiple symbolization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00247.wil
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual overlap and multiple symbolization in signed languages

R Aurora Martínez, Sherman Wilcox, André Xavier
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Conceptual overlap and multiple symbolization in signed languages

R Aurora Martínez, Sherman Wilcox, André Xavier
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper we explore conceptual overlap in two signed languages. Our data comes from natural discourse in Brazilian Sign Language (Libras) and Argentine Sign Language (LSA). Our analysis relies on theoretical constructs derived from cognitive grammar, which posits just three core elements: semantic structures, phonological structures, and symbolic structures which are associations of the first two. Signed languages use symbolic structures we call Places to conceptualize space in signed discourse. We show that one way signed languages express conceptual overlap is with phonological overlap: placing signs at the same spatial location. Our data demonstrates how Places establish nominal referents and discourse topics, create associations among referents, and structure the flow of information. We also offer an account of agreement as a type of conceptual overlap expressed by phonological overlap. A currently popular account of agreement in signed languages argues that these expressions consist of “fusions” of language and gesture. Our account relies solely on linguistic elements and is compatible with that of agreement as multiple symbolization.

Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conceptual overlap and multiple symbolization in signed languages — R Aurora Martínez, Sherman Wilcox, et al. · Review of Cognitive Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS