Quantifying Memory Vulnerabilities in IoT Edge Devices Using Functional Sizing

The Internet of Things (IoT) has evolved through the interconnection of edge devices, enabling seamless data exchange across networks. With IoT adoption expanding into various sectors, the massive growth of generated data has raised concerns about the security of edge devices tasked with processing this information. While several metrics exist to assess vulnerability severity and support risk management, many fail to account for the distinct characteristics of IoT environments and lack precision in evaluating hardware-specific vulnerabilities. This paper provides a comprehensive review of current vulnerability metrics and frameworks and introduces a novel method for analyzing memory-related vulnerabilities in IoT edge devices. The proposed approach leverages functional size measurement through COSMIC (ISO 19761), a standardized measurement method for quantifying software functionality. By applying COSMIC, memory-related vulnerabilities can be assessed from a functional perspective. Additionally, a prototype tool is presented that automates the evaluation of memory vulnerabilities on ESP boards using COSMIC-based measurements. Findings highlight the potential of incorporating functional sizing into IoT security assessment practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metrics
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/metrics3010002
Primary Topic
Security and Verification in Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Memory Vulnerabilities in IoT Edge Devices Using Functional Sizing

Hassan Soubra, Milad Ghantous, Salma Salem, Peter Langendoerfer
Metrics
Security and Verification in Computing
article

Quantifying Memory Vulnerabilities in IoT Edge Devices Using Functional Sizing

Hassan Soubra, Milad Ghantous, Salma Salem, Peter Langendoerfer
article en

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) has evolved through the interconnection of edge devices, enabling seamless data exchange across networks. With IoT adoption expanding into various sectors, the massive growth of generated data has raised concerns about the security of edge devices tasked with processing this information. While several metrics exist to assess vulnerability severity and support risk management, many fail to account for the distinct characteristics of IoT environments and lack precision in evaluating hardware-specific vulnerabilities. This paper provides a comprehensive review of current vulnerability metrics and frameworks and introduces a novel method for analyzing memory-related vulnerabilities in IoT edge devices. The proposed approach leverages functional size measurement through COSMIC (ISO 19761), a standardized measurement method for quantifying software functionality. By applying COSMIC, memory-related vulnerabilities can be assessed from a functional perspective. Additionally, a prototype tool is presented that automates the evaluation of memory vulnerabilities on ESP boards using COSMIC-based measurements. Findings highlight the potential of incorporating functional sizing into IoT security assessment practices.

MetricsVol. 3(1)
École Centrale d'Électronique (FR), Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg (DE), German University in Cairo (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Security and Verification in Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying Memory Vulnerabilities in IoT Edge Devices Using Functional Sizing — Hassan Soubra, Milad Ghantous, et al. · Metrics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS