Public–Private Partnerships in Urban Regeneration: Comparative Insights and Lessons from Brazil, Italy, and the UK

Urban regeneration practices have gained prominence in urban planning in different contexts. Among the different areas subject to urban regeneration, waterfronts stand out as privileged areas of the city and are, therefore, very attractive for new uses. Public–Private Partnership (PPP) agreements are often used to implement these projects. However, PPP agreements in regeneration projects are complex and, in many cases, produce controversial results, either in relation to the partnership itself or to the project resulting from that partnership. In this sense, it is important to provide recommendations for the development of these processes and the resulting projects. Based on this, the present study conducts a comparative analysis between the Brazilian, Italian, and UK contexts regarding PPP arrangements in urban regeneration projects and a comparative analysis between three specific case studies: Porto Maravilha in Rio de Janeiro, Porta a Mare in Livorno, and Harbourside in Bristol. Based on the analyses carried out, the study provides recommendations for improving these practices and the resulting projects. In this sense, it is expected that the study contributes to the state of the art on the subject.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15010180
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public–Private Partnerships in Urban Regeneration: Comparative Insights and Lessons from Brazil, Italy, and the UK

Paula Vale de Paula, Jorge Gonçalves, Rui Cunha Marques
Land
Urban Planning and Valuation
article

Public–Private Partnerships in Urban Regeneration: Comparative Insights and Lessons from Brazil, Italy, and the UK

Paula Vale de Paula, Jorge Gonçalves, Rui Cunha Marques
article en

Abstract

Urban regeneration practices have gained prominence in urban planning in different contexts. Among the different areas subject to urban regeneration, waterfronts stand out as privileged areas of the city and are, therefore, very attractive for new uses. Public–Private Partnership (PPP) agreements are often used to implement these projects. However, PPP agreements in regeneration projects are complex and, in many cases, produce controversial results, either in relation to the partnership itself or to the project resulting from that partnership. In this sense, it is important to provide recommendations for the development of these processes and the resulting projects. Based on this, the present study conducts a comparative analysis between the Brazilian, Italian, and UK contexts regarding PPP arrangements in urban regeneration projects and a comparative analysis between three specific case studies: Porto Maravilha in Rio de Janeiro, Porta a Mare in Livorno, and Harbourside in Bristol. Based on the analyses carried out, the study provides recommendations for improving these practices and the resulting projects. In this sense, it is expected that the study contributes to the state of the art on the subject.

LandVol. 15(1)
University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade Lusófona (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Urban Planning and Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public–Private Partnerships in Urban Regeneration: Comparative Insights and Lessons from Brazil, Italy, and the UK — Paula Vale de Paula, Jorge Gonçalves, et al. · Land (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS