A Meta-Contrastive Optimization Framework for Multilabel Bug Dependency Classification

Software maintenance and release management demand proper identification of bug dependencies since priority violations or unresolved dependent issues can often lead to a chain of failures. However, dependency annotations in bug reports are extremely sparse and imbalanced. These dependencies are often expressed implicitly through natural language descriptions rather than explicit metadata. This creates challenges for automated multilabel dependency classification systems. To tackle these drawbacks, we introduce a meta-contrastive optimization framework (MCOF). This framework integrates established learning paradigms to enhance transformer-based classification through two key mechanisms: (1) a meta-contrastive objective adapted for enhancing discriminative representation learning under few-shot supervision, particularly for rare dependency types, and (2) dependency-aware Laplacian regularization that captures relational structures among different dependency types, reducing confusion between semantically related labels. Experimental evaluation on a real-world dataset demonstrates that MCOF achieves significant improvement over strong baselines, including BM25-based clustering and standard BERT fine-tuning. The framework attains a micro-F1 score of 0.76 and macro-F1 score of 0.58, while reducing hamming loss to 0.14. Label-wise analysis shows significant performance gain on low-frequency dependency types, with improvements of up to 16% in F1 score. Runtime analysis exhibits only modest inference overhead at 15%, confirming that MCOF remains practical for deployment in CI/AT pipelines. These results demonstrate that integrating meta-contrastive learning and structural regularization is an effective approach for robust bug dependency discovery. The framework provides both practical and accurate solutions for supporting real-world software engineering workflows.