Ergonomics evaluation modeling of multimodal interaction technology for airplane cockpit and experimental validation

BackgroundWith the development of eye movement and voice control, multimodal interaction has become a leading trend for future aircraft cockpits. Yet, most studies either demonstrate its effectiveness broadly or focus on single channels, especially the visual channel. A comprehensive ergonomic evaluation method is still lacking.ObjectiveThis study proposes and validates a model for evaluating multimodal interaction in aircraft cockpits, addressing workload distribution, channel occupancy, and resource demand.MethodsOur research proposes an evaluation model for multimodal interaction in aircraft cockpits, based on the analysis of pilots' information cognitive processing. The model sequentially evaluates the workload of multimodal interaction technology in aircraft cockpit scenarios from the perspectives of task level, channel occupancy, and channel resource demand. Validation experiments were conducted using route planning tasks, assessing the workload for tactile interaction modes and multimodal interaction modes.ResultsResults demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed ergonomics evaluation model, as correlation analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between the model outcomes and subjective workload scores under both tactile and multimodal conditions. While multimodal interaction incurred significantly higher task time and subjective workload compared to tactile interaction, it also enabled more balanced workload distribution across channels, suggesting potential advantages for managing complex multi-channel tasks in future cockpit operations.ConclusionsThe validation experiments confirmed the effectiveness of our ergonomics evaluation model for multimodal interaction in airplane cockpit. It offers a practical tool for early cockpit design by identifying channel conflicts and workload distribution issues before prototype development, thus supporting safer and more efficient multimodal systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Work
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815251410547
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ergonomics evaluation modeling of multimodal interaction technology for airplane cockpit and experimental validation

Minhui Yuan, Ruifeng Yu, Lin Ding
Work
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Ergonomics evaluation modeling of multimodal interaction technology for airplane cockpit and experimental validation

Minhui Yuan, Ruifeng Yu, Lin Ding
article en

Abstract

BackgroundWith the development of eye movement and voice control, multimodal interaction has become a leading trend for future aircraft cockpits. Yet, most studies either demonstrate its effectiveness broadly or focus on single channels, especially the visual channel. A comprehensive ergonomic evaluation method is still lacking.ObjectiveThis study proposes and validates a model for evaluating multimodal interaction in aircraft cockpits, addressing workload distribution, channel occupancy, and resource demand.MethodsOur research proposes an evaluation model for multimodal interaction in aircraft cockpits, based on the analysis of pilots' information cognitive processing. The model sequentially evaluates the workload of multimodal interaction technology in aircraft cockpit scenarios from the perspectives of task level, channel occupancy, and channel resource demand. Validation experiments were conducted using route planning tasks, assessing the workload for tactile interaction modes and multimodal interaction modes.ResultsResults demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed ergonomics evaluation model, as correlation analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between the model outcomes and subjective workload scores under both tactile and multimodal conditions. While multimodal interaction incurred significantly higher task time and subjective workload compared to tactile interaction, it also enabled more balanced workload distribution across channels, suggesting potential advantages for managing complex multi-channel tasks in future cockpit operations.ConclusionsThe validation experiments confirmed the effectiveness of our ergonomics evaluation model for multimodal interaction in airplane cockpit. It offers a practical tool for early cockpit design by identifying channel conflicts and workload distribution issues before prototype development, thus supporting safer and more efficient multimodal systems.

Work
AviChina Industry & Technology (China) (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.