Unearthing nanoplastics in soil: optimising extraction and purification while preserving particle integrity

Nanoplastics (NPs) are considered to be widespread environmental pollutants but little is known about their occurrence and properties in soils. Here, we evaluate and optimise an extraction and purification method for NPs in soil, aiming to preserve particle integrity and assess the potential for a single extraction workflow to support characterisation by both advanced microscopy techniques and mass-based techniques such as Py-GC-MS. This targets comprehensive characterisation of NPs, including size, shape, polymer chemistry, and mass concentration data. Individual extraction and purification steps were optimised, including density separation by centrifugation using a sucrose solution, filtration to < 1 μm by vacuum filtration and concentration combined with purification using direct flow ultrafiltration. Recovery tests using Pd-doped NPs aided baseline performance quantification. Recoveries were 38% for extraction (7% SD), 74% for density separation (18% SD), 92% for filtration (15% SD), and 74% for ultrafiltration (7% SD). The final combined method comprising these steps in sequence had a low recovery of 1.4% (0.4% SD), demonstrating the challenge of particle-preserving NPs extraction from soil. Next, we assessed the suitability of our final combined NP extraction method for analysis of NPs by Py-GC-MS and SEM. As part of this feasibility assessment, we tested a step to transfer the extracted NPs for Py-GC-MS analysis by dissolving them in a mixture of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene and p-xylene and drying aliquots in pyrolysis cups (87% recovery, 41% SD). However, high sample dilution during the extraction resulted in a high method detection limit, which was unsuitable for quantitative Py-GC-MS analysis of NPs extracted from soil. In contrast, the method was well suited to qualitative analysis of NPs using advanced microscopy techniques, with SEM images revealing highly purified samples and minimal contamination from soil. As the first study to both evaluate recovery for a particle-preserving NP extraction method in soil and demonstrate its application to analytical techniques, this work provides a foundation for future improvements in NP extraction and analysis methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microplastics and Nanoplastics
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-026-00172-x
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unearthing nanoplastics in soil: optimising extraction and purification while preserving particle integrity

Alberto Frache, Kaori Sakaguchi‐Söder, Sehui Oh, Moritz Bigalke et al.
Microplastics and Nanoplastics
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Unearthing nanoplastics in soil: optimising extraction and purification while preserving particle integrity

Alberto Frache, Kaori Sakaguchi‐Söder, Sehui Oh, Moritz Bigalke, Chiara Gnoffo, Denise M. Mitrano, Hannah Forsyth
article en

Abstract

Nanoplastics (NPs) are considered to be widespread environmental pollutants but little is known about their occurrence and properties in soils. Here, we evaluate and optimise an extraction and purification method for NPs in soil, aiming to preserve particle integrity and assess the potential for a single extraction workflow to support characterisation by both advanced microscopy techniques and mass-based techniques such as Py-GC-MS. This targets comprehensive characterisation of NPs, including size, shape, polymer chemistry, and mass concentration data. Individual extraction and purification steps were optimised, including density separation by centrifugation using a sucrose solution, filtration to < 1 μm by vacuum filtration and concentration combined with purification using direct flow ultrafiltration. Recovery tests using Pd-doped NPs aided baseline performance quantification. Recoveries were 38% for extraction (7% SD), 74% for density separation (18% SD), 92% for filtration (15% SD), and 74% for ultrafiltration (7% SD). The final combined method comprising these steps in sequence had a low recovery of 1.4% (0.4% SD), demonstrating the challenge of particle-preserving NPs extraction from soil. Next, we assessed the suitability of our final combined NP extraction method for analysis of NPs by Py-GC-MS and SEM. As part of this feasibility assessment, we tested a step to transfer the extracted NPs for Py-GC-MS analysis by dissolving them in a mixture of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene and p-xylene and drying aliquots in pyrolysis cups (87% recovery, 41% SD). However, high sample dilution during the extraction resulted in a high method detection limit, which was unsuitable for quantitative Py-GC-MS analysis of NPs extracted from soil. In contrast, the method was well suited to qualitative analysis of NPs using advanced microscopy techniques, with SEM images revealing highly purified samples and minimal contamination from soil. As the first study to both evaluate recovery for a particle-preserving NP extraction method in soil and demonstrate its application to analytical techniques, this work provides a foundation for future improvements in NP extraction and analysis methods.

Microplastics and NanoplasticsVol. 6(1)
Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), ETH Zurich (CH), Azienda Sanitaria Locale Alessandria (IT), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.