Research on and Application of a Low-Carbon Assessment Model for Railway Bridges During the Construction Phase Based on the ANP-Fuzzy Method

Against the backdrop of global climate change and China’s “dual-carbon” goals, carbon emissions from the construction phase of transportation infrastructure, particularly the rapidly expanding railway network, have garnered significant attention. However, systematic research and general evaluation models targeting the factors influencing carbon emissions during the railway bridge construction phase remain insufficient. To address this gap, this study presents a novel low-carbon evaluation model that integrates the analytic network process (ANP) and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) method. First, a carbon accounting model covering four stages—material production, transportation, construction, and maintenance—is established based on life cycle assessment (LCA) theory, providing a data foundation. Second, an innovative low-carbon evaluation index system for railway bridges, comprising 5 criterion layers and 23 indicator layers, is constructed. The ANP method is employed to calculate weights, effectively capturing the interdependencies among indicators, while the FCE method handles assessment ambiguities, forming a comprehensive evaluation framework. A case study of the bridge demonstrates the model’s effectiveness, yielding an evaluation score of 82.38 (“excellent” grade), which is consistent with expert judgement. The ranking of indicator weights from the model is highly consistent with the actual carbon emission inventory ranking (Spearman coefficient of 0.714). Key indicators—C21 (use of high-performance materials), C22 (concrete consumption), and C25 (transportation energy consumption)—collectively account for approximately 60% of the total impact, accurately identifying the major emission sources. This research not only verifies the model’s efficacy in pinpointing critical carbon sources but also provides a scientific theoretical basis and practical tool for low-carbon decision-making and optimization in the planning and design stages of railway bridge projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infrastructures
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11010032
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on and Application of a Low-Carbon Assessment Model for Railway Bridges During the Construction Phase Based on the ANP-Fuzzy Method

Mingzhu Xiu, Dan Ye, Bo Zhao, Jingjing Wang et al.
Infrastructures
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Research on and Application of a Low-Carbon Assessment Model for Railway Bridges During the Construction Phase Based on the ANP-Fuzzy Method

Mingzhu Xiu, Dan Ye, Bo Zhao, Jingjing Wang, Bangyan Guo
article en

Abstract

Against the backdrop of global climate change and China’s “dual-carbon” goals, carbon emissions from the construction phase of transportation infrastructure, particularly the rapidly expanding railway network, have garnered significant attention. However, systematic research and general evaluation models targeting the factors influencing carbon emissions during the railway bridge construction phase remain insufficient. To address this gap, this study presents a novel low-carbon evaluation model that integrates the analytic network process (ANP) and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) method. First, a carbon accounting model covering four stages—material production, transportation, construction, and maintenance—is established based on life cycle assessment (LCA) theory, providing a data foundation. Second, an innovative low-carbon evaluation index system for railway bridges, comprising 5 criterion layers and 23 indicator layers, is constructed. The ANP method is employed to calculate weights, effectively capturing the interdependencies among indicators, while the FCE method handles assessment ambiguities, forming a comprehensive evaluation framework. A case study of the bridge demonstrates the model’s effectiveness, yielding an evaluation score of 82.38 (“excellent” grade), which is consistent with expert judgement. The ranking of indicator weights from the model is highly consistent with the actual carbon emission inventory ranking (Spearman coefficient of 0.714). Key indicators—C21 (use of high-performance materials), C22 (concrete consumption), and C25 (transportation energy consumption)—collectively account for approximately 60% of the total impact, accurately identifying the major emission sources. This research not only verifies the model’s efficacy in pinpointing critical carbon sources but also provides a scientific theoretical basis and practical tool for low-carbon decision-making and optimization in the planning and design stages of railway bridge projects.

InfrastructuresVol. 11(1)
Beijing University of Technology (CN), China Railway Construction Corporation (China) (CN), China Railway Group (China) (CN), China Railway Design Corporation (China) (CN), Beijing Survey and Design Institute (China) (CN), Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.