Revisiting type 1 diabetes progression in the non-obese diabetic mouse

As conventional diagnostic criteria in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice may not reflect the early phase of type 1 diabetes, the applicability of NOD mouse models for early type 1 diabetes in humans can be limited. We therefore aimed to assess stages of beta cell loss in early type 1 diabetes at blood glucose (BG) levels of 80–200 mg/dl in age-stratified NOD mice. Islet composition of five pancreas sections each from 38 female NOD mice was determined using multiplexed-immunohistochemistry staining and Cell2Grid/rule-based automated islet identification. Visual analysis of fm-IHC images led to classification of islet stages. Average islet stage per animal (Islet Score) was correlated with average BG to identify NOD mice subgroups of disease progression. We categorized 3324 islets into islet stages, describing beta cell loss from 0 to 4.The proportion of insulin-deficient islets increased from BG > 126 mg/dl onwards. Three disease progression subgroups in NOD mice were identified: Non-diabetic (Islet Score < 1.0, BG < 126 mg/dl), pre-diabetic (Islet Score > 1.0, BG < 126 mg/dl) and early-diabetic (Islet Score > 1.0, BG > 126 mg/dl and diabetes progression model was established. The revised classification of type 1 diabetes in NOD mice and the resulting type 1 diabetes progression model improves adaptation of the NOD model to human pathophysiology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35483-9
Primary Topic
Diabetes and associated disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting type 1 diabetes progression in the non-obese diabetic mouse

Gabriele Schoiswohl, Lilli Bonstingl, Katja Sallinger, Ceren Karacay et al.
Scientific Reports
Diabetes and associated disorders
article

Revisiting type 1 diabetes progression in the non-obese diabetic mouse

Gabriele Schoiswohl, Lilli Bonstingl, Katja Sallinger, Ceren Karacay, Beate Boulgaropoulos, LAURIN HERBSTHOFER, Wolfgang F. Graier, Beate Obermüller, Barbara Ehall, Victoria Hois, Petra Kotzbeck, Kaddour Bounab, Thomas R. Pieber, Barbara Prietl, Clemens Harer, Joakim Franz, Amin El-Heliebi
article en

Abstract

As conventional diagnostic criteria in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice may not reflect the early phase of type 1 diabetes, the applicability of NOD mouse models for early type 1 diabetes in humans can be limited. We therefore aimed to assess stages of beta cell loss in early type 1 diabetes at blood glucose (BG) levels of 80–200 mg/dl in age-stratified NOD mice. Islet composition of five pancreas sections each from 38 female NOD mice was determined using multiplexed-immunohistochemistry staining and Cell2Grid/rule-based automated islet identification. Visual analysis of fm-IHC images led to classification of islet stages. Average islet stage per animal (Islet Score) was correlated with average BG to identify NOD mice subgroups of disease progression. We categorized 3324 islets into islet stages, describing beta cell loss from 0 to 4.The proportion of insulin-deficient islets increased from BG > 126 mg/dl onwards. Three disease progression subgroups in NOD mice were identified: Non-diabetic (Islet Score < 1.0, BG < 126 mg/dl), pre-diabetic (Islet Score > 1.0, BG < 126 mg/dl) and early-diabetic (Islet Score > 1.0, BG > 126 mg/dl and diabetes progression model was established. The revised classification of type 1 diabetes in NOD mice and the resulting type 1 diabetes progression model improves adaptation of the NOD model to human pathophysiology.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Joanneum Research (AT), Medical University of Graz (AT), Center For Biomarker Research In Medicine (AT)
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Medizinische Universität Graz
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Diabetes and associated disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.