Market Structure and Green Innovation Response to Carbon Pricing: Evidence from the EU Electricity Market

This study examines how national electricity market structures condition the impact of carbon pricing on green innovation within the European Union. Using two-way fixed-effects panel models, we uncover a central paradox: although liberalized, price-signal markets exhibit the highest baseline levels of green innovation, the marginal effect of carbon pricing in these markets is weakest and often negative. This pattern points to an innovation-substitution effect, whereby market flexibility facilitates short-term compliance strategies, such as fuel switching, that crowd out investment in fundamental research and development (R&D) when carbon prices remain moderate. By identifying this mechanism, the study establishes electricity market structure as a pivotal moderating factor in the carbon pricing–innovation nexus and highlights a critical boundary condition for the Porter Hypothesis. The findings provide important insights for the design of sustainability policy mixes, demonstrating that institutional context plays a decisive role in translating economic instruments into sustained technological change. Effective climate policy therefore cannot be context-blind; instead, it must combine carbon pricing with tailored market design and direct support for long-term R&D to coherently advance the sustainability transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18021025
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Market Structure and Green Innovation Response to Carbon Pricing: Evidence from the EU Electricity Market

Woraphon Yamaka, Hao Wang, Tin Maw Maw Tun
Sustainability
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Market Structure and Green Innovation Response to Carbon Pricing: Evidence from the EU Electricity Market

Woraphon Yamaka, Hao Wang, Tin Maw Maw Tun
article en

Abstract

This study examines how national electricity market structures condition the impact of carbon pricing on green innovation within the European Union. Using two-way fixed-effects panel models, we uncover a central paradox: although liberalized, price-signal markets exhibit the highest baseline levels of green innovation, the marginal effect of carbon pricing in these markets is weakest and often negative. This pattern points to an innovation-substitution effect, whereby market flexibility facilitates short-term compliance strategies, such as fuel switching, that crowd out investment in fundamental research and development (R&D) when carbon prices remain moderate. By identifying this mechanism, the study establishes electricity market structure as a pivotal moderating factor in the carbon pricing–innovation nexus and highlights a critical boundary condition for the Porter Hypothesis. The findings provide important insights for the design of sustainability policy mixes, demonstrating that institutional context plays a decisive role in translating economic instruments into sustained technological change. Effective climate policy therefore cannot be context-blind; instead, it must combine carbon pricing with tailored market design and direct support for long-term R&D to coherently advance the sustainability transition.

SustainabilityVol. 18(2)
Chiang Mai University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.